Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33860363›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2021

Management of cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano among gastrointestinal surgeons in the Netherlands.

L Dekker, D D E Zimmerman, R M Smeenk, R Schouten, I J M Han-Geurts

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Anal fistula, there is more than meets the eye!Techniques in coloproctology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

L DekkerDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. l.dekker22@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-8092-7196
D D E ZimmermanDepartment of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0393-9350
R M SmeenkDepartment of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
R SchoutenDepartment of Surgery, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands.
I J M Han-GeurtsDepartment of Surgery, Proctos Kliniek, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLFlevoziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano (FIA) can be challenging. Despite Dutch and international guidelines determining optimal therapy is still quite difficult. The aim of this study was to report current practices in the management of cryptoglandular FIA among gastrointestinal surgeons in the Netherlands.

methodsDutch surgeons and residents who are treating FIA regularly were sent a survey invitation by email. The survey was available online from September 19 to December 1 2019. The questionnaire consisted of 28 questions concerning diagnostic and surgical techniques in the treatment of intersphincteric and transsphincteric FIA.

resultsIn total, 147 (43%) surgeons responded and completed the survey. Magnetic resonance imaging was the preferred diagnostic imaging modality (97%) followed by the endo-anal ultrasound (12%). In case of a high FIA, 86% used a non-cutting seton. Most respondents removed a seton between 6 weeks and 3 months (n = 84, 58%). Fistulotomy was the procedure of preference in low transsphincteric (86%) and low intersphincteric FIA (92%). Mucosal advancement flap (MAF) and ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), with 78% and 46%, respectively, were the procedures that were applied most often in high transsphincteric FIA. In high intersphincteric FIA 67% performed a MAF and 33% a fistulotomy. Thirty-three percent of all respondents stated that they habitually closed the internal fistula opening, half of them used a Z-plasty. For debridement of the fistula tract the preferred method was curettage (78%).

conclusionsDutch gastrointestinal surgeons use various techniques in the management of FIA. Novel promising techniques should be investigated adequately in sufficient large trials to increase consensus. A core outcome measurement and a prospective international database would help in comparing results. Until then, treatment should be adjusted to the individual patient, governed by fistula characteristics and patient choice.

Indexed as

Rectal FistulaSurgeonsAnal CanalHumansLigationNetherlandsProspective StudiesRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeAnal fistulaDiagnosticFistula in anoPerianal fistulaSurgicalSurveyTherapy

Identifiers

PMID33860363
PMCPMC8124037
OpenAlexW3152991767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.