ArticlePalliative medicine reports2021
Cultures of Practice: Specialty-Specific Differences in End-of-Life Conversations.
Article in Palliative medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of the COVID-19 Public Health Crisis and a Structured COVID Unit on Physician Behaviors in Code Status Ordering.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2024Article
- Nurses' self-regulation after engaging in end-of-life conversations with advanced cancer patients: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- The differences in code status conversation approaches reported by emergency medicine and palliative care clinicians: A mixed-method study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024Article
- Limiting life-sustaining treatment for very old ICU patients: cultural challenges and diverse practices.Annals of intensive care · 2023Article
- Prudence in end-of-life decision making: A virtue-based analysis of physician communication with patients and surrogates.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.