ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2021
Robust Surface Reconstruction of Plant Leaves from 3D Point Clouds.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- PMSPA-Net framework with geometric region decomposition for high-precision phenotyping of field-grown maize seedlings.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Digital Inspection Technology for Sheet Metal Parts Using 3D Point Clouds.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Review of Optical-Based Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Multi-Source Fusion for Plant Phenotyping.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- How to make sense of 3D representations for plant phenotyping: a compendium of processing and analysis techniques.Plant methods · 2023Review
- Geometric Wheat Modeling and Quantitative Plant Architecture Analysis Using Three-Dimensional Phytomers.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- 3D modeling and reconstruction of plants and trees: A cross-cutting review across computer graphics, vision, and plant phenotyping.Breeding science · 2022Article
- High-throughput field crop phenotyping: current status and challenges.Breeding science · 2022Article
- Panicle-3D: Efficient Phenotyping Tool for Precise Semantic Segmentation of Rice Panicle Point Cloud.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The automation of plant phenotyping using 3D imaging techniques is indispensable. However, conventional methods for reconstructing the leaf surface from 3D point clouds have a trade-off between the accuracy of leaf surface reconstruction and the method's robustness against noise and missing points. To mitigate this trade-off, we developed a leaf surface reconstruction method that reduces the effects of noise and missing points while maintaining surface reconstruction accuracy by capturing two components of the leaf (the shape and distortion of that shape) separately using leaf-specific properties. This separation simplifies leaf surface reconstruction compared with conventional methods while increasing the robustness against noise and missing points. To evaluate the proposed method, we reconstructed the leaf surfaces from 3D point clouds of leaves acquired from two crop species (soybean and sugar beet) and compared the results with those of conventional methods. The result showed that the proposed method robustly reconstructed the leaf surfaces, despite the noise and missing points for two different leaf shapes. To evaluate the stability of the leaf surface reconstructions, we also calculated the leaf surface areas for 14 consecutive days of the target leaves. The result derived from the proposed method showed less variation of values and fewer outliers compared with the conventional methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.