Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33860247›Full record

ArticleJournal of nematology2021

The grazing activity of

Mercedes García-Sánchez, Mathilde Souche, Carlos Trives-Segura, Claude Plassard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nematology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mercedes García-SánchezEco&Sols, INRAE, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, Institut Agro, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Mathilde SoucheEco&Sols, INRAE, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, Institut Agro, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Carlos Trives-SeguraEco&Sols, INRAE, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, Institut Agro, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Claude PlassardEco&Sols, INRAE, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, Institut Agro, IRD, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbial loop has been suggested as an alternative route for better utilization of phytate, a poorly available P source to plants. We hypothesized that bacterial grazer activity might dramatically enhance bacterial migration and proliferation, increasing the probability of phytate hydrolysis by bacterial phytases and, thus, phytate mineralization and release of free phosphate. We tested this hypothesis in a two-compartment system with a solid medium containing phytate or free phosphate as the source of P. Two bacterial species,

Indexed as

Acrobeloides spBacterial proliferationMicro-food web interactionsNematode migrationPhosphorus cyclingPhytase-producing bacteria

Identifiers

PMID33860247
PMCPMC8039986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.