Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33860162›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2021

Promoting Motivational Interviewing in Primary Care: More Than Intention.

Paul J Hershberger, Lori S Martensen, Timothy N Crawford, Dean A Bricker

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06597123 (AI-Augmented Motivational Interviewing Training for Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06597123 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

AI-Augmented Motivational Interviewing Training for Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorWright State UniversityRan2025 to 2028Enrolled150ConditionsMultiple Chronic Conditions, Patient Engagement, Burnout, Professional, Motivational InterviewingArmsBasic AI (artificial intelligence)-Augmented Motivational Interviewing Training, Plus AI (artificial intelligence)-Augmented Motivational Interviewing Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul J HershbergerDepartment of Family Medicine, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH.
Lori S MartensenDepartment of Medical Education, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH.
Timothy N CrawfordDepartments of Population and Public Health Sciences & Family Medicine, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH.
Dean A BrickerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInteracting with patients in a manner that furthers self-responsibility for health is an important skill for primary care clinicians. Motivational interviewing (MI) is such an approach to patient engagement, but it remains to be more widely implemented. In a program training health professionals and health professions students in MI, we examined posttraining attitudes and intentions regarding the utilization of MI. Of particular interest was how posttraining intentions were associated with self-reported action 1 month later.

methodsWe obtained immediate posttraining and 30-day follow-up data from 209 participants regarding intent to utilize the MI approach (self-reported implementation at the follow-up interval), impact on confidence with patient interaction, and perceived importance of the training. We analyzied frequencies and percentages for all categorical/ordinal variables to describe the participants and the survey question responses.

resultsWhile 91.5% of participants intended to incorporate MI into their approach with patients (to a moderate or great extent) at posttraining, only 48.7% reported that they had actually implemented the MI approach (to a moderate or great extent) 30 days later. However, another 32.1% indicated that they had occasionally utilized MI. Attitudes toward the importance of MI training and the impact of training on confidence remained strong over the 30 days.

conclusionAchieving more widespread implementation of the MI approach in the primary care setting is likely to be less dependent on convincing clinicians about its importance for patient engagement, but rather on the translation of intent to actual practice and implementation.

Identifiers

PMID33860162
PMCPMC8041228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.