ReviewEndoscopy international open2021
Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.
Review in Endoscopy international open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06475560 (Camera Capsule Endoscopy in the Routine Diagnostic Pathway for Colorectal Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Camera Capsule Endoscopy in the Routine Diagnostic Pathway for Colorectal Diseases
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- PillCam COLON 2 for investigation of the colon through direct visualisation: systematic review and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Second-generation capsule endoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps: An updated systematic review and comparative meta-analysis of prospective studies.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Multicenter study of colon capsule endoscopy in post-polypectomy surveillance.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Comment on Altobelli et al. Colon Capsule Endoscopy as a Promising Diagnostic Tool in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Green Endoscopy: A Review of Global Perspectives on Environmental Sustainability of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Colon capsule endoscopy is an effective filter test for colonic polyp surveillance.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Multicentre Study of 10,369 Symptomatic Patients Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy, Colonoscopy and CT Colonography.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Colon Capsule Utilisation in Europe-CAPTURE EU Survey Findings.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Colon capsule endoscopy: Can it contribute to green endoscopy?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Article
- The Diagnostic Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Conference Report: The FutuRE oF MinimalLy InvasivE GI and Capsule DiagnosTics (REFLECT) Nyborg, Denmark, October 2023.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Future of Minimally Invasive Capsule Panendoscopy: Robotic Precision, Wireless Imaging and AI-Driven Insights.Cancers · 2023Review
- Colon Capsule Endoscopy - Shining the Light through the Colon.Current gastroenterology reports · 2023Review
- Clinical utility of colon capsule endoscopy: a moving target?Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Low Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) False Negative Rate for Polyps Excluding Reader Error.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Effectiveness of a Very Low-Volume Compared to High-Volume Laxative in Colon Capsule Endoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Colon Capsule Endoscopy in the Diagnosis of Colon Polyps: Who Needs a Colonoscopy?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.