Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33860025›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research2021

Probiotic effect of

Vladimir Devyatkin, Alexey Mishurov, Evgenia Kolodina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Effect of Combining a Prebiotic (Autolyzed Yeast fromAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  11. The Effect of Orally Administered Multi-Strain Probiotic Formulation (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. New probiotics (Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vladimir DevyatkinDepartment of Physiology and Biochemistry of L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Podolsk, Russia.
Alexey MishurovDepartment of Physiology and Biochemistry of L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Podolsk, Russia.
Evgenia KolodinaLaboratory of Microbiology of L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Podolsk, Russia.
Federal Scientific Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academician L.K. Ernst · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesProbiotics are well documented for their health benefits by developing a balanced intestinal microbiota and boosting immunity. The present study was conducted to determine the effects of a probiotic preparation Enzimsporin MATERIALS AND

methodsEnzimsporin was fed to lambs and sheep at different doses to determine the bacteria's probiotic effects. Sheep were divided into three groups (six each), which received 0, 1, and 3 gm of Enzimsporin/per head/day, respectively, and two groups of lambs (10 each), who received 0 gm and 1 gm of Enzimsporin/per head/day for 30 days in addition to their regular ration. On day 30, blood samples were collected, followed by the determination of biochemical, hematological, and natural resistance indicators. Fecal samples were examined to determine the intestinal microflora, and animals were weighed daily to determine their growth dynamics.

resultsSupplementation of probiotics (Enzimsporin

conclusionSpore-forming bacteria

Indexed as

lambsmicrobiocenosisnatural resistanceSheepspore-forming bacteria

Identifiers

PMID33860025
PMCPMC8043341
OpenAlexW3139108483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.