ArticleJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research2021
Isolation and molecular detection of
Article in Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell SELEX-based DNA aptamer selection targetingVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2026Article
- SaSi qPCR: a novel duplex qPCR assay for rapid and simultaneous detection of Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus iniae in fish.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Unraveling the pathogenic potential, virulence traits, and antibiotic resistance genes of multidrug-resistant Streptococcus agalactiae strains retrieved from Nile tilapia.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Review
- Stability characterizations of feed-based bivalent vaccine containing inactivated Streptococcus agalactiae and Aeromonas hydrophila against streptococcosis and Aeromonas infections in red hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis sp.).Archives of microbiology · 2024Article
- Detection ofJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2023Article
- Intestine and spleen microbiota composition in healthy and diseased tilapia.Animal microbiome · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePresent research aims to isolate, identify, and determine the virulence of the MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 330 fish samples were collected, of which Tilapia (
resultsIsolated bacteria were found Gram-positive paired and chained cocci, β-hemolytic and non-motile. Findings of biochemical and serological tests indicate that the isolated bacterium belongs to Group B Streptococcus of Lancefield classification. PCR result also confirmed that the bacteria were
conclusionFrom the findings of this study, it may be concluded that isolated GBS from the Tilapia and V. Koi fishes were highly virulent and possessed multidrug-resistance properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.