Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33859917›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

Stem Cell Therapy in the Management of Fracture Non-Union - Evaluating Cellular Mechanisms and Clinical Progress.

Harman Khatkar, Abbas See

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Harman KhatkarTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, GBR.
Abbas SeeTrauma and Orthopaedics, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, GBR.
Kettering General Hospital · GBNuffield Health · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone, as a physiological and anatomical construct, displays remarkable intrinsic healing capacity. The overwhelming majority of fractures will heal satisfactorily, if aligned anatomically, compressed and immobilised appropriately. Of the 10% of fractures that do not heal, even under ideal mechanical and biological conditions, further consideration must be given to augment bone healing. Management strategies for non-union pose a significant clinical challenge to the practicing orthopaedic surgeon. Stem cell therapy is beginning to demonstrate significant potential for augmented bone repair in the context of non-union. This review attempts to contextualise the function of stem cells within this clinical setting, reviewing the relevant cellular mechanisms and clinical applications. From evaluating the literature base, there is a lack of high-quality evidence examining the role of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) within this research focus. Appropriately designed randomised controlled trials are required to evaluate this research area further, with a view to guiding future treatment options for the practicing orthopaedic surgeon.

Indexed as

adipose derived stem cellsbone densityorthopaedicsorthopaedics surgerystem cells

Identifiers

PMID33859917
PMCPMC8038927
OpenAlexW3136473565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.