Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33859725›Full record

ArticleJournal of infection prevention2021

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in adult cardiac surgery in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland.

James Kofi Ackah, Louise Neal, Neil R Marshall, Pedram Panahi, Clinton Lloyd, Luke J Rogers

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of infection prevention, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06454643 (The Pharmacological and Clinical Aspects of Using Gentamicin in Cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06454643 nacompletednot on this map

The Pharmacological and Clinical Aspects of Using Gentamicin in Cardiac Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorAl-Rasheed University CollegeRan2020 to 2021Enrolled50ConditionsCardiac InfectionArmsFlucloxacillin and gentamicin, Flucloxacillin and ceftriaxone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Increased incidence of methicillin resistantIranian journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Surgical Site Infection in Cardiac Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James Kofi AckahSouthwest Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, Devon, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6918-0300
Louise NealSouthwest Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, Devon, UK.
Neil R MarshallPlymouth University Medical School, Plymouth, UK.
Pedram PanahiSouthwest Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, Devon, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1601-4920
Clinton LloydSouthwest Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, Devon, UK.
Luke J RogersSouthwest Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, Devon, UK.
University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep sternal wound infections are a financially costly complication of cardiac surgery with serious implications for patient morbidity and mortality. Prophylactic antimicrobials have been shown to reduce the incidence of infection significantly. In 2018, the European Association for CardioThoracic Surgery (EACTS) provided clear guidance advising that third-generation cephalosporins are the first-line prophylactic antimicrobial of choice for cardiac surgery via median sternotomy as a result of their broad spectrum of activity and association with reduced postoperative mortality. Despite this guidance, it was believed that UK practice differed from this as a consequence of national concerns surrounding cephalosporins use and

methodsA survey was developed and distributed to all UK and Republic of Ireland (ROI) cardiac surgery centres in January 2019 to quantify this variation.

resultsOf the 38 centres, 34 responded. Variation existed between the antimicrobial agent used, as well as the dosage, frequency and duration of suggested regimens even among centres using the same antimicrobial agent. The most common antimicrobial prophylaxis prescribed was a combination of flucloxacillin and gentamicin (16, 47%). Followed by cefuroxime (6, 17.6%) and cefuroxime combined with a glycopeptide (4, 11.7%). In patients colonised with methicillin-resistant DISCUSSION: This variation in antimicrobial agents and regimens may well contribute to the varying incidence of surgical site infection seen across the UK and ROI.

Indexed as

adultantimicrobial prophylaxisCardiac surgerycephalosporinsClostridioides difficileClostridium difficiledeep sternal wound infectioninfection preventionsurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID33859725
PMCPMC8014008
OpenAlexW3106867992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.