Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33859708›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2021

Resting-State fMRI in Studies of Acupuncture.

Xiaoling Li, Lina Cai, Xiaoxu Jiang, Xiaohui Liu, Jingxian Wang, Tiansong Yang, Feng Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoling LiFirst Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Lina CaiHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Xiaoxu JiangHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Xiaohui LiuHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Jingxian WangHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Tiansong YangFirst Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4008-702X
Feng WangFirst Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2248-5999
Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research exploring the mechanism of acupuncture has been a hot topic in medicine. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) research is a noninvasive and extensive method, which is aimed at the research of the mechanism of acupuncture. Researchers use fMRI technologies to inspect the acupuncture process. The authors reviewed the application of rs-fMRI in acupuncture research in recent 10 years from the aspects of studying acupoints, subjects, acupuncture methods, and intensities. The results found that the application of rs-fMRI in acupuncture research mainly includes research on the onset mechanism of acupuncture treatment; visual evidence of diagnosis and treatment of dominant diseases; efficacy assessments; physiological mechanism of acupoint stimulation; and specific visualization of acupoints.

Identifiers

PMID33859708
PMCPMC8009717
OpenAlexW3138490003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.