Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33859684›Full record

ReviewGastroenterology research and practice2021

Comparison of Endoscopic Techniques in the Management of Type I Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: A Systematic Review.

Francesco Panzuto, Ludovica Magi, Gianluca Esposito, Maria Rinzivillo, Bruno Annibale

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Current status of the role of endoscopy in evaluation and management of gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  12. Endoscopic techniques for gastric neuroendocrine tumors: An update.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesco PanzutoDigestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2789-4289
Ludovica MagiDigestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9403-1232
Gianluca EspositoDigestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2242-5048
Maria RinzivilloDigestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0489-7735
Bruno AnnibaleDigestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9120-5957
Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic resection is considered the treatment of choice for type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia (gNEN) given its indolent behaviour; however, the favoured endoscopic technique to remove these tumours is not well established.

aimsThis systematic review is aimed at investigating the best endoscopic management for type I gNEN.

methodsPubMed Central/Medline and Scopus were systematically searched for records up to August 31, 2020.

resultsAfter screening the 675 retrieved records, 6 studies were selected for the final analysis. The main endoscopic resection techniques described were endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Overall, 112 gNENs were removed by EMR and 77 by ESD. Both techniques showed similar results for complete and

conclusionsTo date, there are no sufficient data showing superiority of a given endoscopic technique over others. Both ESD and EMR seem to be effective in the management of type I gNEN, with a relatively low rate of recurrence.

Identifiers

PMID33859684
PMCPMC8026302
OpenAlexW3141350764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.