Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33859664›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Integrated Genomic and Greenhouse Assessment of a Novel Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacterium for Tomato Plant.

Maria Chiara Guerrieri, Andrea Fiorini, Elisabetta Fanfoni, Vincenzo Tabaglio, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Marco Trevisan, Edoardo Puglisi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The RhizobacteriumMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparative genomic analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Promotion of the growth and yield ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Chiara GuerrieriDepartment for Sustainable Food Process, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Andrea FioriniDepartment of Sustainable Crop Production, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Elisabetta FanfoniDepartment for Sustainable Food Process, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Vincenzo TabaglioDepartment of Sustainable Crop Production, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Pier Sandro CocconcelliDepartment for Sustainable Food Process, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Marco TrevisanDepartment for Sustainable Food Process, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Edoardo PuglisiDepartment for Sustainable Food Process, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can display several plant-beneficial properties, including support to plant nutrition, regulation of plant growth, and biocontrol of pests. Mechanisms behind these effects are directly related to the presence and expression of specific genes, and different PGPR strains can be differentiated by the presence of different genes. In this study we reported a comprehensive evaluation of a novel PGPR

Indexed as

Azospirillum brasilensegenome analysesinoculationKlebsiella variicolaPGPR

Identifiers

PMID33859664
PMCPMC8042378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.