ArticleScientific reports2021
The anisotropic field of ensemble coding.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial anisotropy in crowding and ensemble perception.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- The mind's average: Unseen, internally generated ensemble representations can guide visual attention.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Examining the role of action-driven attention in ensemble processing.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Mean orientation discrimination based on proximal stimuli.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- The functional role of spatial anisotropies in ensemble perception.BMC biology · 2024Article
- Decoding time-resolved neural representations of orientation ensemble perception.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- The Relation between Ensemble Coding of Length and Orientation Does Not Depend on Spatial Attention.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- How are local orientation signals pooled?Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human observers can accurately estimate statistical summaries from an ensemble of multiple stimuli, including the average size, hue, and direction of motion. The efficiency and speed with which statistical summaries are extracted suggest an automatic mechanism of ensemble coding that operates beyond the capacity limits of attention and memory. However, the extent to which ensemble coding reflects a truly parallel and holistic mode of processing or a non-uniform and biased integration of multiple items is still under debate. In the present work, we used a technique, based on a Spatial Weighted Average Model (SWM), to recover the spatial profile of weights with which individual stimuli contribute to the estimated average during mean size adjustment tasks. In a series of experiments, we derived two-dimensional SWM maps for ensembles presented at different retinal locations, with different degrees of dispersion and under different attentional demands. Our findings revealed strong spatial anisotropies and leftward biases in ensemble coding that were organized in retinotopic reference frames and persisted under attentional manipulations. These results demonstrate an anisotropic spatial contribution to ensemble coding that could be mediated by the differential activation of the two hemispheres during spatial processing and scene encoding.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.