Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33859265›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Robustness of radiomic features in CT images with different slice thickness, comparing liver tumour and muscle.

Lorena Escudero Sanchez, Leonardo Rundo, Andrew B Gill, Matthew Hoare, Eva Mendes Serrao, Evis Sala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Radiomics-Based Assessment of Portal Hypertension Severity and Risk Stratification of Cirrhotic Patients Using Routine CT Scans.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Radiomics for differentiation of somaticJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lorena Escudero SanchezDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. les44@cam.ac.uk.
Leonardo RundoDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. lr495@cam.ac.uk.
Andrew B GillDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Matthew HoareCancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Eva Mendes Serrao *Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Evis Sala *Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UK 26813Cancer Research UK 28667Cancer Research UK 29681Cancer Research UK C18873/A26813Cancer Research UK C42780/A27066Cancer Research UK C52489/A29681Cancer Research UK C9685/A25177Medical Research CouncilVersus ArthritisWellcome TrustWellcome Trust RG98755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiomic image features are becoming a promising non-invasive method to obtain quantitative measurements for tumour classification and therapy response assessment in oncological research. However, despite its increasingly established application, there is a need for standardisation criteria and further validation of feature robustness with respect to imaging acquisition parameters. In this paper, the robustness of radiomic features extracted from computed tomography (CT) images is evaluated for liver tumour and muscle, comparing the values of the features in images reconstructed with two different slice thicknesses of 2.0 mm and 5.0 mm. Novel approaches are presented to address the intrinsic dependencies of texture radiomic features, choosing the optimal number of grey levels and correcting for the dependency on volume. With the optimal values and corrections, feature values are compared across thicknesses to identify reproducible features. Normalisation using muscle regions is also described as an alternative approach. With either method, a large fraction of features (75-90%) was found to be highly robust (< 25% difference). The analyses were performed on a homogeneous CT dataset of 43 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, and consistent results were obtained for both tumour and muscle tissue. Finally, recommended guidelines are included for radiomic studies using variable slice thickness.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularHumansLiverLiver NeoplasmsMusclesRadiometryRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID33859265
PMCPMC8050292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.