Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33859242›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Exogenous enzymes and probiotics alter digestion kinetics, volatile fatty acid content and microbial interactions in the gut of Nile tilapia.

Roel M Maas, Yale Deng, Yueming Dersjant-Li, Jules Petit, Marc C J Verdegem, Johan W Schrama, Fotini Kokou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roel M Maas *Aquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Yale Deng *Aquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Yueming Dersjant-LiDanisco Animal Nutrition, Oegstgeest, The Netherlands.
Jules PetitAquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Marc C J VerdegemAquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Johan W SchramaAquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Fotini KokouAquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. fotini.kokou@wur.nl.
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainable aquafeed production requires fishmeal replacement, leading to an increasing use of plant-derived ingredients. As a consequence, higher levels of antinutritional substances, such as non-starch polysaccharides and phytate, are present in aquafeeds, with negative effects on fish performance, nutrient digestibility and overall gut health. To alleviate these negative effects, providing exogenous digestive enzymes and/or probiotics can be an effective solution. In this study, we tested the effect of dietary supplementation of enzymes (phytase and xylanase) and probiotics (three strains of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens) on nutrient digestion kinetics and volatile fatty acid content along the gut, and the distal gut microbiome diversity in Nile tilapia. Chyme volatile fatty content was increased with probiotic supplementation in the proximal gut, while lactate content, measured for the first time in vivo in fish, decreased with enzymes along the gut. Enzyme supplementation enhanced crude protein, Ca and P digestibility in proximal and middle gut. Enzymes and probiotics supplementation enhanced microbial interactions as shown by network analysis, while increased the abundance of lactic acid bacteria and Bacillus species. Such results suggest that supplementation with exogenous enzymes and probiotics increases nutrient availability, while at the same time benefits gut health and contributes to a more stable microbiome environment.

Indexed as

CichlidsEnzymesProbiotics6-PhytaseAnimal FeedAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsDigestionFatty Acids, VolatileGastrointestinal MicrobiomeKineticsMicrobial InteractionsXylosidases6-PhytaseEnzymesFatty Acids, VolatileXylosidases

Identifiers

PMID33859242
PMCPMC8050056
OpenAlexW3155335444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.