Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33859233›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Novel application of automated machine learning with MALDI-TOF-MS for rapid high-throughput screening of COVID-19: a proof of concept.

Nam K Tran, Taylor Howard, Ryan Walsh, John Pepper, Julia Loegering, Brett Phinney, Michelle R Salemi, Hooman H Rashidi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Mass spectrometry in animal health laboratories: recent history, current applications, and future directions.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Machine learning model of imipenem-resistantHealth science reports · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nam K TranDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, 4400 V St., Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. nktran@ucdavis.edu.
Taylor HowardDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, 4400 V St., Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Ryan WalshShimadzu North America/Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc., Baltimore, USA.
John PepperSpectra Pass, LLC and Allegiant Airlines, Las Vegas, USA.
Julia LoegeringDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, 4400 V St., Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Brett PhinneyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, 4400 V St., Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Michelle R SalemiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, 4400 V St., Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Hooman H RashidiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, 4400 V St., Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. hrashidi@ucdavis.edu.
University of California, Davis · USAlliant Energy (United States) · US

Funding

Phinney - Orbitrap Fusion ETDS10OD021801 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PHINNEY, BRETT S · 2016 to 2016
$600k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2019 novel coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has created an unsustainable need for molecular diagnostic testing. Molecular approaches such as reverse transcription (RT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) offers highly sensitive and specific means to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA, however, despite it being the accepted "gold standard", molecular platforms often require a tradeoff between speed versus throughput. Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI)-time of flight (TOF)-mass spectrometry (MS) has been proposed as a potential solution for COVID-19 testing and finding a balance between analytical performance, speed, and throughput, without relying on impacted supply chains. Combined with machine learning (ML), this MALDI-TOF-MS approach could overcome logistical barriers encountered by current testing paradigms. We evaluated the analytical performance of an ML-enhanced MALDI-TOF-MS method for screening COVID-19. Residual nasal swab samples from adult volunteers were used for testing and compared against RT-PCR. Two optimized ML models were identified, exhibiting accuracy of 98.3%, positive percent agreement (PPA) of 100%, negative percent agreement (NPA) of 96%, and accuracy of 96.6%, PPA of 98.5%, and NPA of 94% respectively. Machine learning enhanced MALDI-TOF-MS for COVID-19 testing exhibited performance comparable to existing commercial SARS-CoV-2 tests.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAutomationCOVID-19High-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansProof of Concept StudySARS-CoV-2Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization

Identifiers

PMID33859233
PMCPMC8050054
OpenAlexW3156033954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.