Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33859220›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Ultrasonic actuation of a fine-needle improves biopsy yield.

Emanuele Perra, Eetu Lampsijärvi, Gonçalo Barreto, Muhammad Arif, Tuomas Puranen, Edward Hæggström, Kenneth P H Pritzker, Heikki J Nieminen

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emanuele PerraMedical Ultrasonics Laboratory (MEDUSA), Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, 02150, Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7432-2139
Eetu LampsijärviElectronics Research Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, 00560, Helsinki, Finland.
Gonçalo BarretoTranslational Immunology Research Program, University of Helsinki, 00100, Helsinki, Finland.
Muhammad ArifMedical Ultrasonics Laboratory (MEDUSA), Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, 02150, Espoo, Finland.
Tuomas PuranenElectronics Research Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, 00560, Helsinki, Finland.
Edward HæggströmElectronics Research Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, 00560, Helsinki, Finland.
Kenneth P H PritzkerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Heikki J NieminenMedical Ultrasonics Laboratory (MEDUSA), Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, 02150, Espoo, Finland. heikki.j.nieminen@aalto.fi.ORCID 0000-0001-6084-1272

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the ubiquitous use over the past 150 years, the functions of the current medical needle are facilitated only by mechanical shear and cutting by the needle tip, i.e. the lancet. In this study, we demonstrate how nonlinear ultrasonics (NLU) extends the functionality of the medical needle far beyond its present capability. The NLU actions were found to be localized to the proximity of the needle tip, the SonoLancet, but the effects extend to several millimeters from the physical needle boundary. The observed nonlinear phenomena, transient cavitation, fluid streams, translation of micro- and nanoparticles and atomization, were quantitatively characterized. In the fine-needle biopsy application, the SonoLancet contributed to obtaining tissue cores with an increase in tissue yield by 3-6× in different tissue types compared to conventional needle biopsy technique using the same 21G needle. In conclusion, the SonoLancet could be of interest to several other medical applications, including drug or gene delivery, cell modulation, and minimally invasive surgical procedures.

Indexed as

NeedlesUltrasonography, InterventionalAnimalsBiopsy, Fine-NeedleCattleDrug Delivery SystemsGene Transfer TechniquesHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPhantoms, ImagingSurgery, Computer-AssistedUltrasonics

Identifiers

PMID33859220
PMCPMC8050323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.