Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33859147›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2021

A Pilot Evaluation of Expedited Partner Treatment and Partner Human Immunodeficiency Virus Self-Testing Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Diagnosed With Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Kisumu, Kenya.

Victor Omollo, Elizabeth A Bukusi, Lara Kidoguchi, Felix Mogaka, Josephine B Odoyo, Connie Celum, Jennifer Morton, Rachel Johnson, Jared M Baeten

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Victor OmolloFrom the Centre for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Elizabeth A Bukusi
Lara KidoguchiDepartment of Global Health.
Felix MogakaFrom the Centre for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Josephine B OdoyoFrom the Centre for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Connie CelumDepartment of Global Health.
Jennifer MortonDepartment of Global Health.
Rachel JohnsonDepartment of Global Health.
Jared M Baeten
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

PEPFAR AID-OAA-A-15-0034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpedited partner treatment (EPT) is effective for preventing sexually transmitted infection recurrence, but concerns about intimate partner violence and missed opportunities for human immunology virus (HIV) testing have limited its use in African settings.

methodsWe conducted a pilot prospective evaluation of EPT among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) accessing HIV preexposure prophylaxis in an implementation project in Kisumu, Kenya. Those with etiologic diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae were treated and given the option of delivering sexually transmitted infection medication and HIV self-test kits to their current sexual partner(s). At enrollment, we assessed their reasons for declining. Three months after they delivered medication and kits to the partner(s), we assessed their reasons for failing to deliver medication and kits to their partner and reported partner's reactions.

resultsBetween September 2018 and March 2020, 63 AGYW were enrolled. The majority (59/63 [94%]) accepted EPT, and 50 (79%) of 63 partner HIV self-testing (HIVST). Three quarters (46/59) of those accepting EPT returned for the assessment visit with 41 (89%) of 46 successfully delivering medication to 54 partners, of whom 49 (91%) used it. Seventy percent (35/50) who took partner HIVST kits returned for the assessment, with 80% (28/35) reporting providing kits to 40 partners, of whom 38 (95%) used it. Reported barriers to EPT and partner HIVST uptake among women who declined included anticipated fear that their partner could become angry or violent and loss of relationship.

conclusionsBoth EPT and partner HIVST were acceptable despite noted barriers among Kenyan AGYW with etiologic diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis/Neisseria gonorrhoeae and their partners.

Indexed as

Chlamydia InfectionsHIV InfectionsAdolescentChlamydia trachomatisContact TracingFemaleHIVHumansKenyaNeisseria gonorrhoeaePilot ProjectsSelf-TestingSexual Partners

Identifiers

PMID33859147
PMCPMC8460075
OpenAlexW3156743867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.