Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33858819›Full record

ReviewArchives of disease in childhood2021

Recommendations by the European Network of Paediatric Research at the European Medicines Agency (Enpr-EMA) Working Group on preparedness of clinical trials about paediatric medicines process.

Angeliki Siapkara, Claudio Fracasso, Gunter F Egger, Carmelo Rizzari, Cristina Serén Trasorras, Dimitrios Athanasiou, Mark A Turner, Working Group Membership

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of disease in childhood, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Angeliki SiapkaraVRNN, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), London, UK.
Claudio FracassoPediatric Centre of Excellence, Pfizer S.r.l, Rome, Italy.
Gunter F EggerScientific Evidence Generation Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Carmelo RizzariDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Cristina Serén TrasorrasInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Dimitrios AthanasiouWord Duchenne Organization, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mark A TurnerInstitute if Life Course and Medical Sciences, Liverpool Health Partners, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK mark.turner@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5299-8656
Working Group Membership
Duchenne Parent Project · NLEuropean Medicines Agency · NLInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago · ESPfizer (Italy) · ITUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conduct of clinical trials in babies, children and young people is often hindered by issues that could have been foreseen before the trial opened; that is, some clinical trials are often underprepared. In order to identify a good approach to trial preparedness, the European Network of Paediatric Research at the European Medicines Agency formed a working group. The Working Group included representation from regulators, industry, academics, paediatric clinical research networks and parents.The Working Group consulted widely about how to prepare for paediatric clinical trials. The Group's detailed recommendations have been published (https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/other/preparedness-medicines-clinical-trials-paediatrics-recommendations-enpr-ema-working-group-trial_en.pdf).This paper is a summary of the key recommendations including the following: start early, preferably in parallel to designing the medicine's development plan and individual protocols; identify the rationale and clinical need; listen to the perspectives of children and families, and of patient advocacy groups; identify how many people will be eligible for the trial; identify the resources needed, such as clinical facilities (including play therapy) and out-of-pocket expenditure by participants and their families; use all available data to estimate what is possible; present information about preparedness in a structured way; deploy proportionate resources to support the preparation of trials.A well-prepared, well-designed trial is likely to require fewer changes during its course, be run in a shorter time frame and achieve expected objectives.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicPediatricsSocieties, MedicalAdolescentHumansdata collectionpharmacologystatistics

Identifiers

PMID33858819
PMCPMC8666697
OpenAlexW3153071304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.