Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33858490›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2021

Comparison of the drug retention and reasons for discontinuation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and interleukin-6 inhibitors in Japanese patients with elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis-the ANSWER cohort study.

Sadao Jinno, Akira Onishi, Maureen Dubreuil, Motomu Hashimoto, Wataru Yamamoto, Koichi Murata, Tohru Takeuchi, Takuya Kotani, Yuichi Maeda, Kosuke Ebina and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Sadao JinnoDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-chou Kobe-shi, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan. sadaoj@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3021-183X
Akira OnishiDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-chou Kobe-shi, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Maureen DubreuilSection of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Motomu HashimotoDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Wataru YamamotoDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Koichi MurataDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Tohru TakeuchiDepartment of Internal Medicine IV, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
Takuya KotaniDepartment of Internal Medicine IV, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
Yuichi MaedaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kosuke EbinaDepartment of Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine, Osaka University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yonsu SonFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Hideki AmuroFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Ryota HaraThe Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Masaki KatayamaDepartment of Rheumatology, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Jun SaegusaDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-chou Kobe-shi, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Kobe University · JPKyoto University · JPKansai Medical University · JPOsaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JPThe University of Osaka · JPBoston University · USNara Medical University · JPOsaka Red Cross Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis multi-center, retrospective study aimed to clarify retention rates and reasons for discontinuation of either tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or interleukin-6 inhibitors (IL-6i) in patients with elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA).

methodsPatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) enrolled in a Japanese multicenter observational registry between 2011 and 2020 were included. EORA was defined as RA with onset at 60 or over. To adjust confounding by indication for treatment with TNFi or IL-6i, a propensity score based on multiple baseline characteristics variables was used to compare the drug retention and causes for discontinuation between TNFi and IL-6i. Adjusted cumulative incidence of drug discontinuation for each reason was compared between the two groups using the Fine-Gray model.

resultsAmong a total of 9,550 patients in the registry, 674 TNFi and 297 IL-6i initiators with EORA were identified. Age, the proportion of females, disease duration, and baseline disease activity at the time of TNFi or IL-6i initiation were similar between the two groups. After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, overall drug discontinuation was significantly lower in the IL-6i as compared to the TNFi (HR = 0.71, 95%CI = 0.59-0.86, p < 0.001). The adjusted cumulative incidence of discontinuation due to lack of effectiveness was lower with the IL-6i (HR = 0.46, 95%CI = 0.33-0.63, p < 0.001) while those due to adverse events (HR = 0.82, 95%CI = 0.56-1.18, p = 0.28) or achievement of clinical remission (HR = 1.09, 95%CI = 0.62-1.91, p = 0.76) were similar between the two groups.

conclusionsIn EORA patients initiating a TNFi or IL-6i, significantly higher drug retention was observed with IL-6i. Discontinuation due to lack of effectiveness was significantly less frequent in IL-6i while discontinuations due to adverse event or achievement of clinical remission were similar between the two groups.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidPharmaceutical PreparationsAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInterleukin-6JapanRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAntirheumatic AgentsInterleukin-6Pharmaceutical PreparationsTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsANSWER cohortBiological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugsDrug retentionElderly onset rheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID33858490
PMCPMC8048332
OpenAlexW3153043519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.