Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33858450›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2021

Development and validation of behavioral intention measures of an E-vapor product: intention to try, use, dual use, and switch.

Stacey A McCaffrey, Jessica Parker Zdinak, Stephanie Plunkett, Elizabeth Becker, Jennifer N Lewis, Ryan A Black

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intentions to Use FDA-Authorized E-Cigarettes Among Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes in the United States.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Adolescents' Understanding of Smoking and Vaping Risk Language: Cognitive Interviews to Inform Scale Development.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stacey A McCaffreyJUUL Labs, Inc., 1000 F Street NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC, 20004, USA.
Jessica Parker ZdinakAltria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA.
Stephanie PlunkettAltria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA.
Elizabeth BeckerAltria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA. Elizabeth.A.Becker@altria.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7462-2684
Jennifer N LewisAltria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA.
Ryan A BlackJUUL Labs, Inc., 1000 F Street NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC, 20004, USA.
Altria (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe harm caused by tobacco use is primarily attributable to cigarette smoking. Switching completely to non-combustible products may reduce disease risks in adult cigarette smokers who are unable or unwilling to quit. Before a new tobacco product can enter the market or can be marketed as a modified risk tobacco product, the manufacturer must determine the impact that the product will have on the likelihood of changes in tobacco use behavior among both tobacco users and nonusers. One way to estimate change in tobacco use behavior is to assess tobacco users' and nonusers' behavioral intentions toward the product and its marketing, including intentions to try, use, dual use, and switch to the product from cigarettes. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate behavioral intention metrics appropriate for use with current, former, and never adult tobacco users.

methodsPreliminary items were subjected to cognitive testing with adult (1) smokers planning to quit cigarettes in the next 30 days, (2) smokers not planning to quit cigarettes in the next 30 days, (3) e-vapor users, (4) former tobacco users, and (5) never tobacco users. Items were iteratively revised based on feedback during cognitive testing, and surviving items were administered to a large sample of adults (N = 2943) representing the aforementioned sub-groups. Rating scale functioning, reliability, validity, bias, and ability to detect change were evaluated.

resultsExamination of the response category thresholds generated by the Rasch model provided evidence that the rating scales were functioning appropriately. Results revealed good stability and excellent internal consistency and person reliability and provided evidence of unidimensionality and convergent validity. Estimates of reliability and validity were similar across sub-groups. A cross-validation sample generally confirmed findings from the validation sample. No items were discarded due to differential item function. Exploratory analyses provided support for ability to detect change.

conclusionsResults from this rigorous, empirical evaluation using large validation and cross-validation samples provide strong support for the psychometric properties of the Intention to Try, Use, Dual Use, and Switch scales with current, former, and never adult tobacco users.

Indexed as

IntentionRisk Reduction BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSmokersSmokingVapingYoung AdultBehavioral intentionE-vaporIntention to switchPsychometric validationPublic healthRasch model

Identifiers

PMID33858450
PMCPMC8048046
OpenAlexW3156046991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.