Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33858403›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

Difference in the general medicine in-training examination score between community-based hospitals and university hospitals: a cross-sectional study based on 15,188 Japanese resident physicians.

Yuji Nishizaki, Keigo Nozawa, Tomohiro Shinozaki, Taro Shimizu, Tomoya Okubo, Yu Yamamoto, Ryota Konishi, Yasuharu Tokuda

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuji NishizakiMedical Technology Innovation Center, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan. ynishiza@juntendo.ac.jp.
Keigo NozawaDepartment of Information and Computer Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, 6-3-1 Niijuku, Katsushika-ku, Tokyo, 125-8585, Japan.
Tomohiro ShinozakiDepartment of Information and Computer Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, 6-3-1 Niijuku, Katsushika-ku, Tokyo, 125-8585, Japan.
Taro ShimizuDepartment of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibumachi, Shimotuga-gun, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan.
Tomoya OkuboResearch Division, National Center for University Entrance Examinations, 2-19-23 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8501, Japan.
Yu YamamotoDivision of General Medicine, Center for Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Ryota KonishiEducation Adviser Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety, 1-1 Kiduki Sumiyoshi-cho, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 211-0021, Japan.
Yasuharu TokudaGeneral Internal Medicine, Muribushi Okinawa for Teaching Hospitals, 3-42-8 Iso, Urasoe-shi, Okinawa, 901-2132, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe general medicine in-training examination (GM-ITE) is designed to objectively evaluate the postgraduate clinical competencies (PGY) 1 and 2 residents in Japan. Although the total GM-ITE scores tended to be lower in PGY-1 and PGY-2 residents in university hospitals than those in community-based hospitals, the most divergent areas of essential clinical competencies have not yet been revealed.

methodsWe conducted a nationwide, multicenter, cross-sectional study in Japan, using the GM-ITE to compare university and community-based hospitals in the four areas of basic clinical knowledge". Specifically, "medical interview and professionalism," "symptomatology and clinical reasoning," "physical examination and clinical procedures," and "disease knowledge" were assessed.

resultsWe found no significant difference in "medical interview and professionalism" scores between the community-based and university hospital residents. However, significant differences were found in the remaining three areas. A 1.28-point difference (95% confidence interval: 0.96-1.59) in "physical examination and clinical procedures" in PGY-1 residents was found; this area alone accounts for approximately half of the difference in total score.

conclusionsThe standardization of junior residency programs and the general clinical education programs in Japan should be promoted and will improve the overall training that our residents receive. This is especially needed in categories where university hospitals have low scores, such as "physical examination and clinical procedures."

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyPhysiciansClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesHospitals, UniversityHumansJapanCommunity-based hospitalGeneralistGeneral medicine in-training examination (GM-ITE)Junior resident physicianUniversity hospital

Identifiers

PMID33858403
PMCPMC8050907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.