Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33858390›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2021

Effect of various dialysis modalities on intradialytic hemodynamics, tissue injury and patient discomfort in chronic dialysis patients: design of a randomized cross-over study (HOLLANT).

Paul A Rootjes, Menso J Nubé, Camiel L M de Roij van Zuijdewijn, Gertrude Wijngaarden, Muriel P C Grooteman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03249532 (Effect of High-volume Online hemodiafiLtration on Intra-diaLytic hemodynAmic), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03249532 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of High-volume Online hemodiafiLtration on Intra-diaLytic hemodynAmic (iN)sTability and Cardiac Function in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients (the HOLLANT Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmsterdam UMC, location VUmcRan2018 to 2021Enrolled40ConditionsEnd Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Hemodialysis, Hemodiafiltration, Intradialytic HypotensionArmsstandard hemodialysis, cool hemodialysis, low volume hemodiafiltration, high volume hemodiafiltration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hemodiafiltration beyond the CONVINCE trial.Clinical kidney journal · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul A RootjesDepartment of Nephrology and Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences (ACS), Amsterdam UMC, VU University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Menso J NubéDepartment of Nephrology and Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences (ACS), Amsterdam UMC, VU University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Camiel L M de Roij van ZuijdewijnDepartment of Nephrology and Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences (ACS), Amsterdam UMC, VU University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gertrude WijngaardenDepartment of Nephrology and Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences (ACS), Amsterdam UMC, VU University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Muriel P C GrootemanDepartment of Nephrology and Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences (ACS), Amsterdam UMC, VU University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. mpc.grooteman@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-5447-2546

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrom a recent meta-analysis it appeared that online post-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF), especially with a high convection volume (HV-HDF), is associated with superior overall and cardiovascular survival, if compared to standard hemodialysis (HD). The mechanism(s) behind this effect, however, is (are) still unclear. In this respect, a lower incidence of intradialytic hypotension (IDH), and hence less tissue injury, may play a role. To address these items, the HOLLANT study was designed.

methodsHOLLANT is a Dutch multicentre randomized controlled cross-over trial. In total, 40 prevalent dialysis patients will be included and, after a run-in phase, exposed to standard HD, HD with cooled dialysate, low-volume HDF and high-volume HDF (Dialog iQ® machine) in a randomized fashion. The primary endpoint is an intradialytic nadir in systolic blood pressure (SBP) of < 90 and < 100 mmHg for patients with predialysis SBP < 159 and ≥ 160 mmHg, respectively. The main secondary outcomes are 1) intradialytic left ventricle (LV) chamber quantification and deformation, 2) intradialytic hemodynamic profile of SBP, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse pressure (PP), 3) organ and tissue damage, such as the release of specific cellular components, and 4) patient reported symptoms and thermal perceptions during each modality. DISCUSSION: The current trial is primarily designed to test the hypothesis that a lower incidence of intradialytic hypotension contributes to the superior survival of (HV)-HDF. A secondary objective of this investigation is the question whether changes in the intradialytic blood pressure profile correlate with organ dysfunction and tissue damage, and/or patient discomfort.

trial registrationRegistered Report Identifier: NCT03249532 # ( ClinicalTrials.gov ). Date of registration: 2017/08/15.

Indexed as

Dialysis SolutionsHemodiafiltrationHemodynamicsKidney Failure, ChronicBiomarkersBlood PressureBlood VolumeBody TemperatureCold TemperatureCross-Over StudiesDNA, BacterialEchocardiographyExtracellular VesiclesHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicMulticenter Studies as TopicBiomarkersDialysis SolutionsDNA, BacterialOxygenHemodiafiltrationHemodialysisIntradialytic blood pressureIntradialytic patient toleranceIntradialytic tissue injuryMulticentre randomized controlled cross-over trial

Identifiers

PMID33858390
PMCPMC8047527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.