Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33858372›Full record

Observational studyBMC infectious diseases2021

Carbon dioxide increases with face masks but remains below short-term NIOSH limits.

Michelle S M Rhee, Carin D Lindquist, Matthew T Silvestrini, Amanda C Chan, Jonathan J Y Ong, Vijay K Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Risks and benefits of face masks in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  5. Physiological responses to mask-associated COFrontiers in public health · 2026
    Review
  6. Rebreathing during CPAP therapy and its implications in obstructive sleep apnea.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle S M RheeTheranova LLC, 101 Mississippi Street, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
Carin D LindquistTheranova LLC, 101 Mississippi Street, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
Matthew T SilvestriniTheranova LLC, 101 Mississippi Street, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
Amanda C ChanDivision of Neurology, National University Hospital and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS, Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, 119228, Singapore City, Singapore.
Jonathan J Y OngDivision of Neurology, National University Hospital and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS, Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, 119228, Singapore City, Singapore.
Vijay K SharmaDivision of Neurology, National University Hospital and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS, Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, 119228, Singapore City, Singapore. mdcvks@nus.edu.sg.
Theranova (United States) · USNational University of Singapore · SGNational University Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeCOVID-19 pandemic led to wide-spread use of face-masks, respirators and other personal protective equipment (PPE) by healthcare workers. Various symptoms attributed to the use of PPE are believed to be, at least in part, due to elevated carbon-dioxide (CO2) levels. We evaluated concentrations of CO2 under various PPE.

methodsIn a prospective observational study on healthy volunteers, CO2 levels were measured during regular breathing while donning 1) no mask, 2) JustAir® powered air purifying respirator (PAPR), 3) KN95 respirator, and 4) valved-respirator. Serial CO2 measurements were taken with a nasal canula at a frequency of 1-Hz for 15-min for each PPE configuration to evaluate whether National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) limits were breached.

resultsThe study included 11 healthy volunteers, median age 32 years (range 16-54) and 6 (55%) men. Percent mean (SD) changes in CO2 values for no mask, JustAir® PAPR, KN95 respirator and valve respirator were 0.26 (0.12), 0.59 (0.097), 2.6 (0.14) and 2.4 (0.59), respectively. Use of face masks (KN95 and valved-respirator) resulted in significant increases in CO2 concentrations, which exceeded the 8-h NIOSH exposure threshold limit value-weighted average (TLV-TWA). However, the increases in CO2 concentrations did not breach short-term (15-min) limits. Importantly, these levels were considerably lower than the long-term (8-h) NIOSH limits during donning JustAir® PAPR. There was a statistically significant difference between all pairs (p < 0.0001, except KN95 and valved-respirator (p = 0.25). However, whether increase in CO2 levels are clinically significant remains debatable.

conclusionAlthough, significant increase in CO2 concentrations are noted with routinely used face-masks, the levels still remain within the NIOSH limits for short-term use. Therefore, there should not be a concern in their regular day-to-day use for healthcare providers. The clinical implications of elevated CO2 levels with long-term use of face masks needs further studies. Use of PAPR prevents relative hypercapnoea. However, whether PAPR should be advocated for healthcare workers requiring PPE for extended hours needs to evaluated in further studies.

Indexed as

MasksRespiratory Protective DevicesAdolescentAdultCarbon DioxideCOVID-19FemaleHealth PersonnelHumansHypercapniaMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTime FactorsYoung AdultCarbon DioxideCarbon dioxide (CO2)Face maskN95Personal protective equipment (PPE)Powered air purifying respirator (PAPR)Respirator

Identifiers

PMID33858372
PMCPMC8049746
OpenAlexW3156045194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.