Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33858008›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Photosynthetic apparatus performance of tomato seedlings grown under various combinations of LED illumination.

Ahmed F Yousef, Muhammad M Ali, Hafiz M Rizwan, Shehu Abubakar Tadda, Hazem M Kalaji, Hao Yang, Mohamed A A Ahmed, Jacek Wróbel, Yong Xu, Faxing Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. OsCPK12-OsATPD1 Module Regulates Photosynthetic Acclimation to Light Stress in Rice.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of LED Applications on Dahlia (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. LED omics in Rocket Salad (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Modulations in ChlorophyllInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ahmed F YousefCollege of Horticulture, Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6614-5566
Muhammad M AliCollege of Horticulture, Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3092-6328
Hafiz M RizwanCollege of Horticulture, Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Shehu Abubakar TaddaCollege of Horticulture, Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Hazem M KalajiDepartment of Plant Physiology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences SGGW, Warsaw, Poland.
Hao YangCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Mohamed A A AhmedCollege of Horticulture, Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Jacek WróbelDepartment of Bioengineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Yong XuCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Faxing ChenCollege of Horticulture, Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is already known that the process of photosynthesis depends on the quality and intensity of light. However, the influence of the new light sources recently used in horticulture, known as Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs), on this process is not yet fully understood. Chlorophyll a fluorescence measurement has been widely used as a rapid, reliable, and noninvasive tool to study the efficiency of the photosystem II (PSII) and to evaluate plant responses to various environmental factors, including light intensity and quality. In this work, we tested the responses of the tomato photosynthetic apparatus to different light spectral qualities. Our results showed that the best performance of the photosynthetic apparatus was observed under a mixture of red and blue light (R7:B3) or a mixture of red, green and blue light (R3:G2:B5). This was demonstrated by the increase in the effective photochemical quantum yield of PSII (Y[II]), photochemical quenching (qP) and electron transport rate (ETR). On the other hand, the mixture of red and blue light with a high proportion of blue light led to an increase in non-photochemical quenching (NPQ). Our results can be used to improve the production of tomato plants under artificial light conditions. However, since we found that the responses of the photosynthetic apparatus of tomato plants to a particular light regime were cultivar-dependent and there was a weak correlation between the growth and photosynthetic parameters tested in this work, special attention should be paid in future research.

Indexed as

LightChlorophyll AHumidityPhotosynthesisPhotosystem II Protein ComplexSeedlingsSolanum lycopersicumSpectrometry, FluorescenceTemperatureChlorophyll APhotosystem II Protein Complex

Identifiers

PMID33858008
PMCPMC8049771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.