Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33857917›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Determining the Efficacy of Electronic Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder Compared to Pharmaceutical Interventions: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Study.

Nazanin Alavi, Callum Stephenson, Megan Yang, Amirhossein Shirazi, Yijia Shao, Anchan Kumar, Caitlin S Yee, Shadé Miller, Anthi Stefatos, Maedeh Gholamzadehmir and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04478526 (Determining the Efficacy of Online Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder Compared to Pharmaceutical Interventions), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04478526 nacompletednot on this map

Determining the Efficacy of Online Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder Compared to Pharmaceutical Interventions

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr. Nazanin AlaviRan2020 to 2021Enrolled115ConditionsGeneralized Anxiety DisorderArmsSSRIs/SNRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/ Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors), Electronic Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nazanin AlaviDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8710-6067
Callum StephensonDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7929-1546
Megan YangDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6365-2039
Amirhossein ShiraziDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8586-3707
Yijia ShaoDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5596-4294
Anchan KumarDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8850-8495
Caitlin S YeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5536-6518
Shadé MillerDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9667-7088
Anthi StefatosDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4932-7392
Maedeh GholamzadehmirDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4064-9552
Zara AbbaspourDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8228-1456
Archana PatelDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7661-7096
Charmy PatelDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9217-5833
Taras ReshetukhaDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0494-8053
Mohsen OmraniOPTT Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0461-1947
Dianne GrollDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6913-5710
Queen's University · CAOptech (Canada) · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneralized anxiety disorder (GAD) is an extremely prevalent and debilitating mental health disorder. Currently, the gold standard treatment for GAD is cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and/or pharmacotherapy. The most common medications used to treat GAD are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. While CBT is the gold standard treatment for GAD, it is costly, time-consuming, and often inaccessible. Fortunately, the electronic delivery of CBT (e-CBT) has emerged as a promising solution to address these barriers. e-CBT has shown to offer comparable results to in-person CBT while improving accessibility for patients and time efficiency for clinicians.

objectiveThis study aims to investigate the treatment efficacy of e-CBT compared to and in conjunction with pharmacotherapy for GAD.

methodsThis study will use a quasi-experimental design to allow patients the freedom to choose which treatment modality they would like to receive. Participants with a diagnosis of GAD will be enrolled in 1 of 3 possible treatment arms: (1) e-CBT, (2) medication, or (3) a combination of e-CBT and medication. The e-CBT program will include a 12-week psychotherapy program delivered through the Online Psychotherapy Tool-a secure, cloud-based, digital mental health platform. The treatment efficacy of e-CBT will be compared with that of medication alone and medication in combination with e-CBT.

resultsThe study received ethics approval in April 2019 and participant recruitment began in June 2019. Participant recruitment has been conducted through social media advertisements, physical advertisements, and physician referrals. To date, 146 participants (e-CBT: n=53; medication: n=49; combination: n=44) have been recruited. Data collection is expected to conclude by June 2021, and data analysis is expected to be completed by October 2021. Linear regression (for continuous outcomes) and binomial regression (for categorical outcomes) analysis will be conducted using interpretive qualitative methods.

conclusionsIf either the efficacy of e-CBT is shown to be comparable to that of medication or the effects of both treatments are augmented when used in tandem, these findings could have major implications on the mental health care system. e-CBT is a more accessible and affordable treatment that could increase mental health care capacity 4-fold if proven viable.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04478526; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04478526. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/27772.

Indexed as

anxietycognitive behavioral therapyeHealthelectronicgeneralized anxiety disorderinternetmental healthmental health careonlinepsychotherapyvirtual

Identifiers

PMID33857917
PMCPMC8193484
OpenAlexW3152664028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.