ArticlePediatric pulmonology2022
Digital solutions for sleep problems in children: A pilot study.
Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current methods for analyzing time-series patient-generated health data to assess treatment response: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Handling Editor: Monica AndersenA global perspective of parent engagement with digital sleep health interventions for young children: A scoping review.Sleep medicine reviews · 2026Article
- The Global Socioeconomic Burden of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Comprehensive Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Pediatric Telemedicine Research Agenda: Another Important Task for Pediatric Chairs.The Journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Standing on the shoulders of giants: A decade of research on digital pediatric sleep interventions.Pediatric pulmonology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children with sleep difficulties have limited options for treatment. Advancements in technology allow for the digital delivery of evidence-based sleep strategies developed with a focus on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approaches for insomnia. An initial survey study was conducted to assess the need and current management of sleep problems in pediatric populations. A secondary pilot study evaluated the effect of a digitally-delivered sleep strategy for the treatment of pediatric sleep problems. In the pilot study, participants had access to a mobile application which provided individualized CBT-focused sleep solutions delivered over 6-10 weeks. A total of 218 participants were surveyed to determine their need and approach for pediatric sleep problems. Approximately 74% reported sleep problems in children aged 0-1 (46%), 2-4 (67%), 5-12 (85%), and 13-17 (73%). In the pilot study, 11 families with pediatric sleep problems (children categorized as baby, toddler and school-aged) were enrolled and received the DrLullaby digital intervention. An improvement in key sleep behavior was observed including "time to fall asleep" (n = 8; 72.7%), "total time asleep" (n = 6; 54.5%) and "time awake" (n = 7; 63.6%). Within group analysis for time awake and time to fall asleep showed a mean change from baseline of 75.6% and 31.3%, respectively. Within group analysis for total time asleep showed a mean improvement of 1 h and 3 min compared to baseline. The collective distress scale score was decreased by 35%. These results suggest viability of the digital delivery of evidence-based sleep strategies for treatment of pediatric sleep problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.