Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33857313›Full record

ArticleRadiation research2021

Small Molecule Responses to Sequential Irradiation with Neutrons and Photons for Biodosimetry Applications: An Initial Assessment.

Evagelia C Laiakis, Monica Pujol Canadell, Veljko Grilj, Andrew D Harken, Guy Y Garty, David J Brenner, Lubomir Smilenov, Albert J Fornace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Practical, Noninvasive Urine Collection Method for Mice for Large Cohort Preclinical Studies.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sex differences in radiation research.International journal of radiation biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Biomarkers to Predict Lethal Radiation Injury to the Rat Lung.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. The NIAID/RNCP Biodosimetry Program: An Overview.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Evagelia C LaiakisDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Monica Pujol CanadellCenter for Radiological Research, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Veljko GriljRadiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University, Irvington, New York.
Andrew D HarkenRadiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University, Irvington, New York.
Guy Y GartyRadiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University, Irvington, New York.
David J BrennerCenter for Radiological Research, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Lubomir SmilenovCenter for Radiological Research, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Albert J FornaceDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Funding

Sample Engineering CoreU19AI067773 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FORNACE, ALBERT J · 2005 to 2024
$105.4M
Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Louis M Weiner · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass casualty exposure scenarios from an improvised nuclear device are expected to be far more complex than simple photons. Based on the proximity to the explosion and potential shielding, a mixed field of neutrons and photons comprised of up to approximately 30% neutrons of the total dose is anticipated. This presents significant challenges for biodosimetry and for short-term and long-term medical treatment of exposed populations. In this study we employed untargeted metabolomic methods to develop a biosignature in urine and serum from C57BL/6 mice to address radiation quality issues. The signature was developed in males and applied to samples from female mice to identify potential sex differences. Thirteen urinary (primarily amino acids, vitamin products, nucleotides) and 18 serum biomarkers (primarily mitochondrial and fatty acid β oxidation intermediates) were selected and evaluated in samples from day 1 and day 7 postirradiation. Sham-irradiated groups (controls) were compared to an equitoxic dose (3 Gy X-ray equivalent) from X rays (1.2 Gy/min), neutrons (∼1 Gy/h), or neutrons-photons. Results showed a time-dependent increase in the efficiency of the signatures, with serum providing the highest levels of accuracy in distinguishing not only between exposed from non-exposed populations, but also between radiation quality (photon exposures vs. exposures with a neutron component) and in between neutron-photon exposures (5, 15 or 25% of neutrons in the total dose) for evaluating the neutron contribution. A group of metabolites known as acylcarnitines was only responsive in males, indicating the potential for different mechanisms of action in baseline levels and of neutron-photon responses between the two sexes. Our findings highlight the potential of metabolomics in developing biodosimetric methods to evaluate mixed exposures with high sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

Mice, Inbred C57BLNeutronsPhotonsRadiometryAnimalsBiomarkersDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleMaleMiceBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID33857313
PMCPMC9004252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.