Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33857152›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Linking statistical shape models and simulated function in the healthy adult human heart.

Cristobal Rodero, Marina Strocchi, Maciej Marciniak, Stefano Longobardi, John Whitaker, Mark D O'Neill, Karli Gillette, Christoph Augustin, Gernot Plank, Edward J Vigmond and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Full-field surrogate modeling of cardiac electrophysiology encoding geometric variability.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. 3D cardiac shape analysis with variational point cloud autoencoders for myocardial infarction prediction and virtual heart synthesis.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Computational modelling of biological systems now and then: revisiting tools and visions from the beginning of the century.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. A computational study on the influence of antegrade accessory pathway location on the 12-lead electrocardiogram in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cristobal RoderoCardiac Electromechanics Research Group, Biomedical Engineering Department, King´s College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7921-7840
Marina StrocchiCardiac Electromechanics Research Group, Biomedical Engineering Department, King´s College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1312-251X
Maciej MarciniakCardiac Modelling and Imaging Biomarkers, Biomedical Engineering Department, King´s College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4277-7446
Stefano LongobardiCardiac Electromechanics Research Group, Biomedical Engineering Department, King´s College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0111-0047
John WhitakerCardiovascular Imaging Department, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5361-5725
Mark D O'NeillDepartment of Cardiology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6070-7177
Karli GilletteInstitute of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0420-5375
Christoph AugustinInstitute of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6341-4014
Gernot PlankInstitute of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7380-6908
Edward J VigmondInstitute of Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling, Foundation Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1388-3589
Pablo LamataCardiac Modelling and Imaging Biomarkers, Biomedical Engineering Department, King´s College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3097-4928
Steven A NiedererCardiac Electromechanics Research Group, Biomedical Engineering Department, King´s College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4612-6982

Funding

Using Atrial Mechanics To Identify Fibrosis In Patients with Atrial FibrillationR01HL152256 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ENNIS, DANIEL B · 2020 to 2023
$2.8M
British Heart Foundation PG/16/75/32383British Heart Foundation RG/20/4/34803Medical Research Council MR/N001877/1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL152256Wellcome Trust 209450/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac anatomy plays a crucial role in determining cardiac function. However, there is a poor understanding of how specific and localised anatomical changes affect different cardiac functional outputs. In this work, we test the hypothesis that in a statistical shape model (SSM), the modes that are most relevant for describing anatomy are also most important for determining the output of cardiac electromechanics simulations. We made patient-specific four-chamber heart meshes (n = 20) from cardiac CT images in asymptomatic subjects and created a SSM from 19 cases. Nine modes captured 90% of the anatomical variation in the SSM. Functional simulation outputs correlated best with modes 2, 3 and 9 on average (R = 0.49 ± 0.17, 0.37 ± 0.23 and 0.34 ± 0.17 respectively). We performed a global sensitivity analysis to identify the different modes responsible for different simulated electrical and mechanical measures of cardiac function. Modes 2 and 9 were the most important for determining simulated left ventricular mechanics and pressure-derived phenotypes. Mode 2 explained 28.56 ± 16.48% and 25.5 ± 20.85, and mode 9 explained 12.1 ± 8.74% and 13.54 ± 16.91% of the variances of mechanics and pressure-derived phenotypes, respectively. Electrophysiological biomarkers were explained by the interaction of 3 ± 1 modes. In the healthy adult human heart, shape modes that explain large portions of anatomical variance do not explain equivalent levels of electromechanical functional variation. As a result, in cardiac models, representing patient anatomy using a limited number of modes of anatomical variation can cause a loss in accuracy of simulated electromechanical function.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularAdultHealthy VolunteersHeartHumansTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID33857152
PMCPMC8049237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.