Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33857127›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

An investigation of conventional microbial culture for the Naja atra bite wound, and the comparison between culture-based 16S Sanger sequencing and 16S metagenomics of the snake oropharyngeal bacterial microbiota.

Yan-Chiao Mao, Han-Ni Chuang, Chien-Hung Shih, Han-Hsueh Hsieh, Yu-Han Jiang, Liao-Chun Chiang, Wen-Loung Lin, Tzu-Hung Hsiao, Po-Yu Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A Case ofClinical case reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yan-Chiao MaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Division of Clinical Toxicology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Han-Ni ChuangDepartment of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chien-Hung ShihDepartment of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Han-Hsueh HsiehDepartment of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yu-Han JiangDepartment of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Liao-Chun ChiangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Division of Clinical Toxicology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4846-1837
Wen-Loung LinTaichung Wildlife Conservation Group, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3308-6042
Tzu-Hung HsiaoDepartment of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0365-9970
Po-Yu LiuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8006-4917
Taichung Veterans General Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWFu Jen Catholic University · TWNational Chung Hsing University · TWTaiwan Livestock Research Institute · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naja atra is a major venomous snake found in Taiwan. The bite of this snake causes extensive wound necrosis or necrotizing soft tissue infection. Conventional microbial culture-based techniques may fail to identify potential human pathogens and render antibiotics ineffective in the management of wound infection. Therefore, we evaluated 16S Sanger sequencing and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify bacterial species in the oropharynx of N. atra. Using conventional microbial culture methods and the VITEK 2 system, we isolated nine species from snakebite wounds. On the basis of the 16S Sanger sequencing of bacterial clones from agar plates, we identified 18 bacterial species in the oropharynx of N. atra, including Morganella morganii, Proteus vulgaris, and Proteus mirabilis, which were also present in the infected bite wound. Using NGS of 16S metagenomics, we uncovered more than 286 bacterial species in the oropharynx of N. atra. In addition, the bacterial species identified using 16S Sanger sequencing accounted for only 2% of those identified through NGS of 16S metagenomics. The bacterial microbiota of the oropharynx of N. atra were modeled better using NGS of 16S metagenomics compared to microbial culture-based techniques. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Proteus penneri were also identified in the NGS of 16S metagenomics. Understanding the bacterial microbiota that are native to the oropharynx of N. atra, in addition to the bite wound, may have additional therapeutic implications regarding empiric antibiotic selection for managing N. atra bites.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsNaja najaAdultAgedAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedOropharynxRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSnake BitesTaiwanAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID33857127
PMCPMC8078740
OpenAlexW3152688884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.