Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33856745›Full record

ReviewAdvanced biology2021

Patient-Specific Organoid and Organ-on-a-Chip: 3D Cell-Culture Meets 3D Printing and Numerical Simulation.

Fuyin Zheng, Yuminghao Xiao, Hui Liu, Yubo Fan, Ming Dao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Advances in the study of gastric organoids as disease models.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fuyin ZhengKey Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2113-8810
Yuminghao XiaoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Hui LiuKey Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Yubo FanKey Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Ming DaoDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5372-385X

Funding

Wide-Field Short-Wave Infrared (SWIR) multiphoton (MP) tissue imagingP41EB015871 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SO, PETER T. · 2012 to 2021
$11.3M
Multifidelity and multiscale modeling of the spleen function in sickle cell disease with in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo validationsR01HL154150 · NHLBI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Pierre BUFFET, Ming Dao · 2020 to 2026
$3.9M
Multiscale Modeling of Sickle Cell Anemia: Methods and ValidationU01HL114476 · NHLBI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI DAO, MING, HIGGINS, JOHN MATTHEW · 2013 to 2017
$3.9M
Characterizing mechanisms of sickle cell crisis via dynamic optical assayR01HL121386 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SO, PETER T. · 2014 to 2016
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL121386NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL154150NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL114476NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last few decades have witnessed diversified in vitro models to recapitulate the architecture and function of living organs or tissues and contribute immensely to advances in life science. Two novel 3D cell culture models: 1) Organoid, promoted mainly by the developments of stem cell biology and 2) Organ-on-a-chip, enhanced primarily due to microfluidic technology, have emerged as two promising approaches to advance the understanding of basic biological principles and clinical treatments. This review describes the comparable distinct differences between these two models and provides more insights into their complementarity and integration to recognize their merits and limitations for applicable fields. The convergence of the two approaches to produce multi-organoid-on-a-chip or human organoid-on-a-chip is emerging as a new approach for building 3D models with higher physiological relevance. Furthermore, rapid advancements in 3D printing and numerical simulations, which facilitate the design, manufacture, and results-translation of 3D cell culture models, can also serve as novel tools to promote the development and propagation of organoid and organ-on-a-chip systems. Current technological challenges and limitations, as well as expert recommendations and future solutions to address the promising combinations by incorporating organoids, organ-on-a-chip, 3D printing, and numerical simulation, are also summarized.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesOrganoidsCell Culture TechniquesHumansMicrofluidicsPrinting, Three-Dimensional3D printingnumerical simulationsorganoidsorgan-on-a-chipsynergistic engineering

Identifiers

PMID33856745
PMCPMC8243895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.