Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33856614›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2021

Vinasse from sugarcane bagasse (hemicellulose) acid hydrolysate and molasses supplemented: biodegradability and toxicity.

João Paulo Candido, Éryka Costa Almeida, Dilza Nalin de Oliveira Leite, Michel Brienzo, Dejanira de Franceschi de Angelis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

João Paulo CandidoDepartment of General and Applied Biology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Av. 24-A, 1515, CEP: 13506-900, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil. joaopaulocan@yahoo.com.br.
Éryka Costa AlmeidaDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof Lineu Prestes, 580, Bl. 17, CEP: 05508-000, São Paulo - SP, Brazil.
Dilza Nalin de Oliveira LeiteDepartment of General and Applied Biology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Av. 24-A, 1515, CEP: 13506-900, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
Michel BrienzoLaboratory of Characterization and Conversion of Biomass (LCCB), Institute for Research in Bioenergy (IPBEN), São Paulo State University (UNESP), R. 10, 2527, Santana, 13500-230,, Rio Claro, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Dejanira de Franceschi de AngelisDepartment of General and Applied Biology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Av. 24-A, 1515, CEP: 13506-900, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/22401-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vinasse sugarcane is a valuable byproduct of the ethanol production process, presenting a perspective of volume increase with the development of second generation ethanol (2GE). However, this byproduct needs new methods of treatment and management for sustainability. Besides that, 2GE vinasse can be associated with some compounds (such as furan derivatives, phenolic compounds and organic acids), depending on the process used to solubilize hemicellulose, which could compromise vinasse destination or utilization. For this reason, detoxification methods of the hemicellulosic hydrolysates, from which vinasse is obtained in subsequent steps, are crucial. This study aimed to investigate whether the biological detoxification of vinasse from 2GE presents a difference concerning the microbial activity of biodegradation and toxicity when compared to vinasse without the detoxification process. Two vinasses (1, before; and 2, after detoxification) from fermented sugarcane bagasse (hemicellulose fraction) acid hydrolysate (supplemented with its molasses), under different concentrations: 2.5; 5 e 10% were evaluated. Their physicochemical characterization, biodegradation microbial activity (through Bartha and Pramer respirometric method, with total count of heterotrophic bacteria and fungi), and toxicity evaluation (through bioassays with Lactuca sativa at concentraction: 2.5; 5 e 10% and Daphnia similis to 1.5; 2.5; 3.5; 4.5; 5 and 10%) were performed. The results indicated high mineral and organic matter, which under a specific circumstance (2.5% of soil conditioning), enabled high efficiency in biodegradation (>80%). The bioassays with L. sativa signaled negative effect for radicular growth when the vinasses were applied at a concentration of 5 and 10% (sublethal effect and delayed root growth). Acute effects were observed in D. similis, with 50% of immobilization, at concentrations of 4.13% and 4.74% for vinasses 1 and 2, respectively. These results indicate that the biodegradation of vinasse from sugarcane bagasse acid hydrolysate occurs at relatively low levels (up to 5%) and suggests that higher concentrations (≥10%) may impair the growth of soil-associated microorganisms.

Indexed as

SaccharumCelluloseMolassesPolysaccharidesbagasseCellulosehemicellulosePolysaccharidesAcid hydrolysateHemicellulosic ethanolLignocellulose materialsRespirometric degradation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.