ArticleInternational ophthalmology2021
Automatic segmentation of corneal dystrophy on photographic images based on texture analysis.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MCOA: A Comprehensive Multimodal Dataset for Advancing Deep Learning in Corneal Opacity Assessment.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop an automatic algorithm to analyze dystrophic lesions on photographic images of corneal dystrophy.
methodsThe dataset included 32 images of corneal dystrophy. The dystrophic area was manually segmented twice. Manually labeled dystrophy areas were compared with automatically segmented images. First, we manually removed the light reflex from the image of the cornea. Using an automatic approach, we extracted the brown color of the iris. Then, the program detected the circular region of the pupil and the corneal surface. A whitish dystrophy area was defined based on the image intensity on the iris and the pupil. The sliding square kernel was applied to clearly define the dystrophic region.
resultsFor the manual analysis and the twice automatic approach, the Dice similarity was 0.804 and 0.801, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.807 and 0.806, respectively. The total number of distinct dystrophic areas showed no significant difference between the manual and automatic approaches according to the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p < 0.0001, both).
conclusionsWe proposed an automatic algorithm for detecting the dystrophy areas on photographic images with an accuracy of approximately 0.80. This system can be applied to detect and predict the progression of corneal dystrophy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33856597What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.