Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33856509›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Assessing locoregional treatment response to Hepatocellular Carcinoma: comparison of hepatobiliary contrast agents to extracellular contrast agents.

Anum Aslam, Amita Kamath, Bradley Spieler, Mark Maschiocchi, Carl F Sabottke, Victoria Chernyak, Sara C Lewis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anum AslamDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5030, USA. aanum@med.umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6243-5286
Amita KamathDepartment of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5005-415X
Bradley SpielerDepartment of Radiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1542 Tulane Avenue, Rm 343, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7346-2885
Mark MaschiocchiUmass Memorial Medical Center- University Campus, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA.
Carl F SabottkeDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2176-0845
Victoria ChernyakDepartment of Radiology and Urology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, 10467, USA.
Sara C LewisDepartment of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USUMass Memorial Health Care · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-sectional imaging with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is routinely performed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to assess tumor response to locoregional therapy (LRT). Current response assessment algorithms, such as the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA), allow assessment using conventional gadolinium-based extracellular contrast agents (ECA) for accurate tumor response assessment following LRT. MRI with hepatobiliary agents (HBA) allows an acquisition of hepatobiliary phase (HBP), which is proven to increase sensitivity for detection of observations in at-risk patients, particularly for findings < 2 cm. The use of HBA is not yet incorporated into the TRA; however, it is increasingly used in clinical practice. Few published studies have evaluated the performance of LI-RADS TRA by applying ancillary features related to HBP that has resulted in category adjustment, enabling more sensitive and unequivocal diagnosis. This may help timely management of viable cases, without a significant loss of specificity in comparison with the ECA-based LI-RADS TRA assessment. In this review, we will describe and compare the imaging appearance of treated HCC on MRI using extracellular and hepatobiliary contrast agents and discuss emerging evidence and pitfalls in the assessment of tumor response following LRT with HBA.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAExtracellular contrast agentGadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRIHepatocellular carcinomaLocoregional treatment response

Identifiers

PMID33856509
OpenAlexW3153226825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.