Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33856501›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2021

Utility of three-dimensional and reformatted head computed tomography images in the evaluation of pediatric abusive head trauma.

Rangarajan Purushothaman, Shivang Desai, Sateesh Jayappa, Arabinda K Choudhary, Raghu H Ramakrishnaiah

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rangarajan PurushothamanDepartment of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), 4301 W. Markham St. Slot 556, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA. dr.rangarp@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9223-5370
Shivang DesaiDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Sateesh JayappaDepartment of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), 4301 W. Markham St. Slot 556, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Arabinda K ChoudharyDepartment of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), 4301 W. Markham St. Slot 556, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Raghu H RamakrishnaiahDepartment of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), 4301 W. Markham St. Slot 556, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skull fractures are common in the pediatric population following head trauma and are estimated to occur post head trauma in 11% of children younger than 2 years. A skull fracture indicates potential underlying intracranial injury and might also help explain the mechanism of injury. Multiple primary and accessory sutures complicate the identification of non-depressed fractures in children younger than 2 years. Detection of linear skull fractures can be difficult on two-dimensional (2-D) CT and can be missed, particularly when the fracture is along the plane of image reconstruction. Knowledge of primary and accessory sutures as well as normal anatomical variants is of paramount importance in identifying pediatric skull fractures with a greater degree of confidence. Acute fractures appear as lucent cortical defects that do not have sclerotic borders, in contrast to sutures, which might demonstrate sclerotic margins. Three-dimensional (3-D) CT has increased sensitivity and specificity for detecting skull fractures and is essential in the evaluation of pediatric head CTs for distinguishing subtle fractures from sutural variants, especially in the setting of trauma. In this review, we present our experience of the use of 3-D reformats in head CT and its implications on the interpretation, especially in the setting of accidental or abusive head trauma.

Indexed as

Child AbuseCraniocerebral TraumaSkull FracturesChildHumansInfantRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAbusive head traumaChild abuseChildrenComputed tomographyFracturesSkullSuturesThree-dimensional

Identifiers

PMID33856501
OpenAlexW3156839378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.