Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33856488›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2021

Classical phenotyping and deep learning concur on genetic control of stomatal density and area in sorghum.

Raju Bheemanahalli, Chaoxin Wang, Elfadil Bashir, Anuj Chiluwal, Meghnath Pokharel, Ramasamy Perumal, Naghmeh Moghimi, Troy Ostmeyer, Doina Caragea, S V Krishna Jagadish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Stomatal development in the changing climate.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Investigation of a Perspective Urban Tree Species,Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Raju BheemanahalliDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9325-4901
Chaoxin WangDepartment of Computer Science, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2076-5946
Elfadil BashirAgricultural Research Center, Kansas State University, Hays, Kansas 67601, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2330-5291
Anuj ChiluwalDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.
Meghnath PokharelDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.
Ramasamy PerumalAgricultural Research Center, Kansas State University, Hays, Kansas 67601, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0649-8853
Naghmeh MoghimiDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3973-5886
Troy OstmeyerDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3793-729X
Doina CarageaDepartment of Computer Science, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6440-0914
S V Krishna JagadishDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1501-0960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stomatal density (SD) and stomatal complex area (SCA) are important traits that regulate gas exchange and abiotic stress response in plants. Despite sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) adaptation to arid conditions, the genetic potential of stomata-related traits remains unexplored due to challenges in available phenotyping methods. Hence, identifying loci that control stomatal traits is fundamental to designing strategies to breed sorghum with optimized stomatal regulation. We implemented both classical and deep learning methods to characterize genetic diversity in 311 grain sorghum accessions for stomatal traits at two different field environments. Nearly 12,000 images collected from abaxial (Ab) and adaxial (Ad) leaf surfaces revealed substantial variation in stomatal traits. Our study demonstrated significant accuracy between manual and deep learning methods in predicting SD and SCA. In sorghum, SD was 32%-39% greater on the Ab versus the Ad surface, while SCA on the Ab surface was 2%-5% smaller than on the Ad surface. Genome-Wide Association Study identified 71 genetic loci (38 were environment-specific) with significant genotype to phenotype associations for stomatal traits. Putative causal genes underlying the phenotypic variation were identified. Accessions with similar SCA but carrying contrasting haplotypes for SD were tested for stomatal conductance and carbon assimilation under field conditions. Our findings provide a foundation for further studies on the genetic and molecular mechanisms controlling stomata patterning and regulation in sorghum. An integrated physiological, deep learning, and genomic approach allowed us to unravel the genetic control of natural variation in stomata traits in sorghum, which can be applied to other plants.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyGenotypePhenotypeDeep LearningEdible GrainGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantGenetic VariationPlant LeavesPlant StomataSorghum

Identifiers

PMID33856488
PMCPMC8260133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.