Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33856487›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2021

E-Cigarette Advertising in the UK: A Content Analysis of Traditional and Social Media Advertising to Observe Compliance with Current Regulations.

Martine Stead, Allison Ford, Kathryn Angus, Anne Marie MacKintosh, Richard Purves, Danielle Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Content Analysis of Nicotine Descriptors on the Front of Vape Packaging in the United Kingdom.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Promotion of Premium Cigars on Social Media.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. A Comparative Analysis of E-Cigarette and Cigarette Posts on Instagram.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martine SteadInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Allison FordInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Kathryn AngusInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5351-4422
Anne Marie MacKintoshInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Richard PurvesInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6527-0218
Danielle MitchellInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8692-5407

Funding

Cancer Research UK 30539Cancer Research UK C24178/A30539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe advertising of e-cigarettes in the UK is regulated through the revised EU Tobacco Products Directive and the Tobacco and Related Products Regulations, with further rules set out in the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) Committees of Advertising (CAP) Code. Focusing on the ASA CAP Code Rules, we examined e-cigarette advertising regulation compliance in traditional advertising channels and on social media.

methodsWe conducted a content analysis of UK e-cigarette and related product advertising using a randomly selected sample (n = 130) of advertising in traditional channels and on Instagram which appeared between January and December 2019. All ads were independently double-coded to assess compliance with each CAP Code Rule.

resultsIn traditional channels, our sample of advertising had largely good compliance. Only very small numbers of these ads appeared to be clearly in breach of any of the ASA rules (5% were in breach of Rule 22.7; 2% of Rule 22.9; and 1% of Rule 22.10). In contrast, we judged that all of the Instagram sample (n = 30) was in breach of Rule 22.12. For some rules, it was not possible to make definitive judgments about compliance, given uncertainty regarding how a rule should be interpreted and applied.

conclusionsWe found overall good compliance for advertising in traditional channels, but assessed all of our social media advertising samples was in breach of regulations. Current guidance on e-cigarette advertising could be improved to facilitate e-cigarette advertising assessment and regulation. It would be beneficial to bring consumer perspectives into the assessment of regulation compliance. IMPLICATIONS: The regulation of e-cigarette advertising is a global concern. The UK Government has a statutory obligation to review the Tobacco and Related Products Regulations by May 2021. This study assessed compliance with current UK e-cigarette advertising regulations on placement and content. We identified areas where greater clarity is needed and outlined implications for future regulation.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSocial MediaTobacco ProductsAdvertisingHumansUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID33856487
PMCPMC8496471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.