Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33856137›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of radiology2021

Detection of Contralateral Breast Cancer Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Comparison with Combined Mammography and Whole-Breast Ultrasound.

Su Min Ha, Jung Min Chang, Su Hyun Lee, Eun Sil Kim, Soo Yeon Kim, Yeon Soo Kim, Nariya Cho, Woo Kyung Moon

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Breast Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Current Applications, Insights from Screening, and Future Directions.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Non-contrast Breast MR Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Su Min HaDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1833-0919
Jung Min ChangDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5726-9797
Su Hyun LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0171-8060
Eun Sil KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0632-9902
Soo Yeon KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8915-3924
Yeon Soo KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1838-202X
Nariya ChoDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4290-2777
Woo Kyung MoonDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. moonwk@snu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-8931-3772
Seoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the screening performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI and combined mammography and ultrasound (US) in detecting clinically occult contralateral breast cancer in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsBetween January 2017 and July 2018, 1148 women (mean age ± standard deviation, 53.2 ± 10.8 years) with unilateral breast cancer and no clinical abnormalities in the contralateral breast underwent 3T MRI, digital mammography, and radiologist-performed whole-breast US. In this retrospective study, three radiologists independently and blindly reviewed all DW MR images (b = 1000 s/mm² and apparent diffusion coefficient map) of the contralateral breast and assigned a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category. For combined mammography and US evaluation, prospectively assessed results were used. Using histopathology or 1-year follow-up as the reference standard, cancer detection rate and the patient percentage with cancers detected among all women recommended for tissue diagnosis (positive predictive value; PPV₂) were compared.

resultsOf the 30 cases of clinically occult contralateral cancers (13 invasive and 17 ductal carcinoma

conclusionIn women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, DW MRI detected significantly more contralateral breast cancers with fewer biopsy recommendations than combined mammography and US.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyMastectomyMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBreast cancerDiffusion-weighted imagingMammographyScreeningUltrasonographyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID33856137
PMCPMC8154781
OpenAlexW3142576392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.