Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33855839›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2021

[Research progress of autogenous cartilage scaffold carving method in rhinoplasty].

Siding Lu, Guoqian Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Siding LuDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning Guangxi, 530021, P.R.China.
Guoqian YinDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning Guangxi, 530021, P.R.China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo summarize the research progress of autogenous cartilage scaffold carving method in rhinoplasty.

methodsThe relevant literature about the autogenous cartilage scaffold carving methods in rhinoplasty in resent years at home and abroad was reviewed, and the carving skills, shape, and application scope of different parts of nasal scaffolds were summarized and analyzed.

resultsWillow-leaf shape is still the main method of cartilage scaffold in the back of the nose. However, in nasal reconstruction, it can be carved into an L-shaped scaffold with the nasal columella scaffold through mortise and tenon structure. And it can also crush the autologous cartilage and wrap it with the autologous fascia tissue to form a new nasal dorsal scaffold. The nasal tip scaffold is improved by changing the shape of traditional nasal tip cartilage cap and wrapping with fascia tissue; the nasal alar scaffold has M-shape, q-shape, carving methods; the nasal columella and nasal septum are mostly used "2+2" combined fixed scaffold. The cartilage scaffolds of lateral nose and nasal base are mainly carved in the shape of "" and crescent.

conclusionAs a rhinoplasty scaffold, there are various carving methods for autogenous cartilage. With the innovation of surgical technique and the improvement of sculpting technique, the effect of autologous cartilage graft in rhinoplasty is getting better and better; meanwhile, tissue engineered cartilage is being applied in rhinoplasty.

Indexed as

RhinoplastyAutograftsNasal CartilagesNasal SeptumNoseTransplantation, AutologousAutogenous cartilagerhinoplastyscaffold carving

Identifiers

PMID33855839
PMCPMC8171616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.