Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33855817›Full record

ArticleApplied psychology. Health and well-being2021

It won't happen to me! Psychosocial factors influencing risk perception for respiratory infectious diseases: A scoping review.

Sofia Tagini, Agostino Brugnera, Roberta Ferrucci, Ketti Mazzocco, Angelo Compare, Vincenzo Silani, Gabriella Pravettoni, Barbara Poletti

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sofia TaginiDepartment of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9888-7911
Agostino BrugneraDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Roberta FerrucciDepartment of Health Sciences, Aldo Ravelli Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, International Medical School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Ketti MazzoccoDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1382-6779
Angelo CompareDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Vincenzo SilaniDepartment of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Gabriella PravettoniDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Barbara PolettiDepartment of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4398-2051
University of Milan · ITIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITUniversity of Bergamo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the determinants of risk perception for COVID-19 might help to promote self-preventive behaviours. This scoping review aimed to map the extent, variety and characteristics of the evidence on the possible determinants of risk perception for COVID-like diseases. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for original, peer-reviewed English-written articles published up to March 2020 and investigating risk perception determinants for respiratory infectious diseases in adults. Titles and abstracts were screened, and full texts were analysed by the first author; when unsure, eligibility was discussed with the last author. Data were collected according to an extraction sheet developed by the first and last authors. The cross-sectional evidence covers a variety of diseases, countries and timings of testing. Mostly, questionnaires recorded socio-demographics, media exposure, trust in institutions, disease proximity and knowledge; psychological variables, including personality traits, distress and self-efficacy, were less investigated. A miscellaneous operationalization of risk perception emerged, including the likelihood of getting sick, perceived dangerousness, concerns or a combination of them. A comprehensive understanding of the substantial amount of evidence may be challenging due to methodological heterogeneity. Referring to uniform theoretical frameworks is recommended; also, longitudinal research may be implemented to probe causal relationships.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesCOVID-19AdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPerceptionSARS-CoV-2containment measuresCOVID-19respiratory infectious diseasesrisk perceptionrisk perception determinants

Identifiers

PMID33855817
PMCPMC8250503
OpenAlexW3156428074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.