Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33855796›Full record

Trial reportPsycho-oncology2021

Improved cancer coping from a web-based intervention for prostate cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial.

Erin K Tagai, Suzanne M Miller, Shawna V Hudson, Michael A Diefenbach, Elizabeth Handorf, Alicja Bator, Allison Marziliano, Alexander Kutikov, Simon J Hall, Manish Vira and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psycho-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interactive digital tools to support empowerment of people with cancer: a systematic literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erin K TagaiCancer Prevention and Control, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Suzanne M MillerCancer Prevention and Control, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7296-9318
Shawna V HudsonDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Michael A DiefenbachCenter for Health Innovations and Outcomes Research, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, USA.
Elizabeth HandorfDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alicja BatorDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Allison MarzilianoCenter for Health Innovations and Outcomes Research, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4762-1416
Alexander KutikovDivision of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Simon J HallThe Arthur Smith Institute for Urology, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, USA.
Manish ViraThe Arthur Smith Institute for Urology, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, USA.
Michael SchwartzThe Arthur Smith Institute for Urology, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, USA.
Issac Yi KimRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Sung KimRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Northwell Health · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Eric Andrew Ross · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILINGP30CA072720 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Tracie Saunders · 1997 to 2026
$94.5M
New Jersey Alliance for Clinical Translational Science: NJ ACTSUL1TR003017 · NCATS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI PANETTIERI, REYNOLD ALEXANDER · 2019 to 2023
$28.9M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN CANCER RESEARCHT32CA009035 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI CHERNOFF, JONATHAN · 1985 to 2020
$10.5M
RCT of an Online Multimedia Program to Boost Coping & Function for Pca SurvivorsR01CA158019 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI MILLER, SUZANNE M · 2011 to 2015
$3.5M
Recovery Support for Bladder CA Patients and Caregivers: A Multimodal ApproachR01CA224918 · NCI · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI DIEFENBACH, MICHAEL A, MILLER, SUZANNE M · 2018 to 2023
$3.5M
Informed/Shared Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening Among Members of the World Trade Center Health ProgramU01OH011690 · OH · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI DIEFENBACH, MICHAEL A, MOLINE, JACQUELINE · 2018 to 2020
$1.5M
ACL HHS U01OH011690NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003017NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS P30 CA072720NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158019NCI NIH HHS R01 CA224918NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009035NIOSH CDC HHS U01 OH011690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesProstate cancer (PCa) survivors report poor physical functioning alongside negative psychological outcomes as they cope with treatment side effects and practical concerns after treatment completion. This study evaluated PROGRESS, a web-based intervention designed to improve adaptive coping among PCa survivors.

methodsLocalized PCa patients (N = 431) within one year of treatment completion were randomized to receive educational booklets or PROGRESS + educational booklets. Surveys completed at baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-months assessed patient characteristics; functional quality of life and coping (primary outcomes); and psychosocial outcomes (e.g., self-efficacy, marital communication; secondary outcomes). Intent-to-treat and as-treated analyses were completed to assess change in outcomes from baseline to 6 months using linear mixed effects regression models.

resultsIn the intent-to-treat analyses, participants randomized to the intervention group had improved diversion coping (i.e., healthy redirection of worrying thoughts about their cancer), but more difficulties in marital communication (ps < 0.05). However, PROGRESS usage was low among those randomized to the intervention group (38.7%). The as-treated analyses found PROGRESS users reported fewer practical concerns but had worse positive coping compared to PROGRESS non-users (ps < 0.05).

conclusionsThe findings suggest PROGRESS may improve certain aspects of adaptive coping among PCa survivors that use the website, but does not adequately address the remaining coping and psychosocial domains. Additional research is needed to better understand the gaps in intervention delivery contributing to low engagement and poor improvement across all domains of functional quality of life and adaptive coping.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsInternet-Based InterventionProstatic NeoplasmsAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansMaleQuality of LifeSurvivorseHealthprostate cancerquality of liferandomized controlled trialsurvivorshipurologic oncology

Identifiers

PMID33855796
PMCPMC9053312
OpenAlexW3156532412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.