Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33855667›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2021

Improved X-ray baggage screening sensitivity with 'targetless' search training.

Alex Muhl-Richardson, Maximilian G Parker, Sergio A Recio, Maria Tortosa-Molina, Jennifer L Daffron, Greg J Davis

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alex Muhl-RichardsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK. am2662@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5673-4052
Maximilian G ParkerDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Sergio A RecioDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Maria Tortosa-MolinaDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Jennifer L DaffronDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Greg J DavisDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK. gjd1000@cam.ac.uk.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When searching for a known target, mental representations of target features, or templates, guide attention towards matching objects and facilitate recognition. When only distractor features are known, distractor templates allow irrelevant objects to be recognised and attention to be shifted away. This is particularly true in X-ray baggage search, a challenging real-world visual search task with implications for public safety, where targets may be unknown, difficult to predict and concealed by an adversary, but distractors are typically benign and easier to identify. In the present study, we draw on basic principles of distractor suppression and rejection to investigate a counterintuitive 'targetless' approach to training baggage search. In a simulated X-ray baggage search task, we observed significant benefits to target detection sensitivity (d') for targetless relative to target-based training, but no effects of performance-contingent rewards or the inclusion of superordinate semantic categories during training. The benefits of targetless search training were most apparent for stimuli involving less spatial overlap (occlusion), which likely represents the difficulty and greater individual variation involved in searching more visually complex images. Together, these results demonstrate the effectiveness of a counterintuitive targetless approach to training target detection in X-ray baggage search, based on basic principles of distractor suppression and rejection, with potential for use as a real-world training tool.

Indexed as

Recognition, PsychologySemanticsMass ScreeningResearchX-RaysDistractor templatesTargetless searchTarget templatesTemplates for rejectionVisual searchX-ray baggage search

Identifiers

PMID33855667
PMCPMC8046861
OpenAlexW3154199724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.