Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33855591›Full record

Observational studyEuropean radiology2021

Audio-guided self-hypnosis for reduction of claustrophobia during MR imaging: results of an observational 2-group study.

Adriane E Napp, Torsten Diekhoff, Olf Stoiber, Judith Enders, Gerd Diederichs, Peter Martus, Marc Dewey

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Treating Hot Flashes with Hypnosis: Does Hypnotizability Modulate Reductions?Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Claustrophobia-empowering the patient.European radiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adriane E Napp *Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Mitte, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Charité Platz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Torsten Diekhoff *Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Mitte, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Charité Platz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. torsten.diekhoff@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3593-1449
Olf StoiberHypnovita, Academy of Hypnotic Medical Arts, Josephsburgstraße 33, 81673, Munich, Germany.
Judith EndersDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Mitte, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Charité Platz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Gerd DiederichsDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Vircho-Klinikum, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Peter MartusClinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Silcherstraße 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Marc DeweyDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Mitte, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Charité Platz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. dewey@charite.de.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the influence of audio-guided self-hypnosis on claustrophobia in a high-risk cohort undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

methodsIn this prospective observational 2-group study, 55 patients (69% female, mean age 53.6 ± 13.9) used self-hypnosis directly before imaging. Claustrophobia included premature termination, sedation, and coping actions. The claustrophobia questionnaire (CLQ) was completed before self-hypnosis and after MR imaging. Results were compared to a control cohort of 89 patients examined on the same open MR scanner using logistic regression for multivariate analysis. Furthermore, patients were asked about their preferences for future imaging.

resultsThere was significantly fewer claustrophobia in the self-hypnosis group (16%; 9/55), compared with the control group (43%; 38/89; odds ratio .14; p = .001). Self-hypnosis patients also needed less sedation (2% vs 16%; 1/55 vs 14/89; odds ratio .1; p = .008) and non-sedation coping actions (13% vs 28%; 7/55 vs 25/89; odds ratio .3; p = .02). Self-hypnosis did not influence the CLQ results measured before and after MR imaging (p = .79). Self-hypnosis reduced the frequency of claustrophobia in the subgroup of patients above an established CLQ cut-off of .33 from 47% (37/78) to 18% (9/49; p = .002). In the subgroup below the CLQ cut-off of 0.33, there were no significant differences (0% vs 9%, 0/6 vs 1/11; p = 1.0). Most patients (67%; 35/52) preferred self-hypnosis for future MR examinations.

conclusionsSelf-hypnosis reduced claustrophobia in high-risk patients undergoing imaging in an open MR scanner and might reduce the need for sedation and non-sedation coping actions. KEY POINTS: • Forty percent of the patients at high risk for claustrophobia may also experience a claustrophobic event in an open MR scanner. • Self-hypnosis while listening to an audio in the waiting room before the examination may reduce claustrophobic events in over 50% of patients with high risk for claustrophobia. • Self-hypnosis may also reduce the need for sedation and other time-consuming non-sedation coping actions and is preferred by high-risk patients for future examinations.

Indexed as

HypnosisPhobic DisordersAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnxietyHypnosisMagnetic resonance imagingPhobic disorders

Identifiers

PMID33855591
PMCPMC8213599
OpenAlexW3155814502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.