Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33855588›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Real-life assessment of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®/ESCULAP) in hepatic nodules in cirrhotic patients-a prospective multicenter study.

D Strobel, E-M Jung, M Ziesch, M Praktiknjo, A Link, C F Dietrich, C Klinger, M Schultheiß, D Jesper, B Schellhaas

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

D StrobelUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Medizinische Klinik 1, Erlangen, Germany.
E-M JungUniversitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
M ZieschDiakonissenkrankenhaus Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
M PraktiknjoUniversitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
A LinkUniversitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
C F DietrichCaritas Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Bad Mergentheim, Germany.
C KlingerKlinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
M SchultheißUniversitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
D JesperUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Medizinische Klinik 1, Erlangen, Germany.
B SchellhaasUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Medizinische Klinik 1, Erlangen, Germany. barbara.schellhaas@uk-erlangen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5499-6080
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DECaritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim · DEDiakonissenkrankenhaus · DEKlinikum Ludwigsburg · DEKlinikum Magdeburg · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed non-invasively with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in cirrhosis if the characteristic pattern of arterial phase hyperenhancement followed by hypoenhancement is present. Recent studies suggest that diagnosis based on this "hyper-hypo" pattern needs further refinement. This study compares the diagnostic accuracies of standardized CEUS for HCC according to the current guideline definition and following the newly developed CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®, ESCULAP) in a prospective multicenter real-life setting.

methodsCirrhotic patients with liver lesions on B-mode ultrasound were recruited prospectively from 04/2018 to 04/2019, and clinical and imaging data were collected. The CEUS standard included an additional examination point after 4-6 min in case of no washout after 3 min. The diagnostic accuracies of CEUS following the guidelines ("hyper-hypo" pattern), based on the examiner's subjective interpretation ("CEUS subjective"), and based on the CEUS algorithms ESCULAP and CEUS LI-RADS® were compared.

resultsIn total, 470 cirrhotic patients were recruited in 43 centers. The final diagnosis was HCC in 378 cases (80.4%) according to the reference standard (histology 77.4%, MRI 16.4%, CT 6.2%). The "hyper-hypo" pattern yielded 74.3% sensitivity and 63% specificity. "CEUS subjective" showed a higher diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 91.5%; specificity, 67.4%; positive predictive value, 92%; negative predictive value, 66%). Sensitivity was higher for ESCULAP (95%) and "CEUS subjective" (91.5%) versus CEUS LI-RADS® (65.2%; p < 0.001). Specificity was highest for CEUS LI-RADS® (78.6%; p < 0.001).

conclusionsCEUS has an excellent diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in cirrhosis. CEUS algorithms may be a helpful refinement of the "hyper-hypo" pattern defined by current HCC guidelines. KEY POINTS: • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has a high diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis. • The CEUS algorithm ESCULAP (Erlanger Synopsis for Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Liver lesion Assessment in Patients at risk) showed the highest sensitivity, whereas the CEUS LI-RADS® (Contrast-Enhanced UltraSound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) algorithm yielded the highest specificity. • A standardized CEUS examination procedure with an additional examination point in the late phase, after 4-6 min in lesions with no washout after 3 min, is vital.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsAlgorithmsContrast MediaHumansLiver CirrhosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyContrast MediaCarcinoma, hepatocellularContrast mediaDiagnostic imagingLiverUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID33855588
PMCPMC8452566
OpenAlexW3154637884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.