Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33855452›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical entomology2021

Larval Conditioning and Aging of Sand Fly Rearing Medium Affect Oviposition Site Selection in Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) Sand Flies.

Lindsey R Faw, Kasie Raymann, Nayma Romo Bechara, Gideon Wasserberg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. An oviposition pheromone, hexadecanoic acid, found on the eggs ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Luring the vector: A systematic review of sand fly attractants.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lindsey R FawDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 235 Eberhart Building, Greensboro, NC 27402, USA.
Kasie RaymannDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 235 Eberhart Building, Greensboro, NC 27402, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7008-2783
Nayma Romo BecharaDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 235 Eberhart Building, Greensboro, NC 27402, USA.
Gideon WasserbergDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 235 Eberhart Building, Greensboro, NC 27402, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0366-8359
University of North Carolina at Greensboro · US

Funding

Oviposition attractants for sand fly controlR01AI123327 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO · PI WASSERBERG, GIDEON · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sand fly larvae develop in sheltered humid habitats containing decaying organic matter on which they feed. Previously, we showed that gravid females of Phlebotomus papatasi Scopoli (Diptera: Psychodidae) are attracted to and stimulated to lay eggs on larval rearing medium containing larvae. That study, however, did not control for the possible effect of medium aging. Our goal in this study was to evaluate the effect of larval substrate conditioning on attraction and oviposition responses of Ph. papatasi sand flies while controlling for the effect of substrate aging. Initially, we confirmed that the pretreatment fresh larval food sources (to be used as larval conditioned and unconditioned media) did not differ with respect to their effect on attraction and oviposition responses. The larval conditioned medium was produced by rearing larvae to the second/third-instar stage over 3 wk using the same larval food source. To produce larval unconditioned medium, the same amount of fresh larval food was added to a control rearing cup that did not contain larvae but was aged under identical time and conditions. Two-choice bioassays were conducted to evaluate gravid female's attraction and oviposition response to larval conditioned and unconditioned media. We found that gravid females were significantly attracted (P < 0.05) to larval conditioned medium when compared with unconditioned medium under the same amount of time and conditions. However, no such difference was found with respect to oviposition response. Both attraction and oviposition responses were significantly increased for larval conditioned and unconditioned media in comparison to the initial fresh larval food source.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsBiological AssayInsect VectorsOvipositionPhlebotomusgravid femalelarval rearing mediummicrobiomeoviposition attractantoviposition site selection

Identifiers

PMID33855452
PMCPMC8285006
OpenAlexW3152550727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.