Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33855433›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical entomology2021

Comparing Contributions of Passive and Active Tick Collection Methods to Determine Establishment of Ticks of Public Health Concern Within Illinois.

Lee Ann Lyons, Mary E Brand, Peg Gronemeyer, Nohra Mateus-Pinilla, Marilyn O'Hara Ruiz, Chris M Stone, Holly C Tuten, Rebecca L Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Tick species infesting humans in the United States.Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lee Ann LyonsDepartment of Pathobiology, University of Illinois, 2001 S. Lincoln Avenue, Urbana, IL 61802, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0682-0504
Mary E BrandIllinois Natural History Survey-Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois, 1816 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
Peg GronemeyerDepartment of Pathobiology, University of Illinois, 2001 S. Lincoln Avenue, Urbana, IL 61802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9033-3292
Nohra Mateus-PinillaDepartment of Pathobiology, University of Illinois, 2001 S. Lincoln Avenue, Urbana, IL 61802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2732-7359
Marilyn O'Hara RuizDepartment of Pathobiology, University of Illinois, 2001 S. Lincoln Avenue, Urbana, IL 61802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3941-8733
Chris M StoneIllinois Natural History Survey-Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois, 1816 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9535-2583
Holly C TutenIllinois Natural History Survey-Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois, 1816 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2333-5677
Rebecca L SmithDepartment of Pathobiology, University of Illinois, 2001 S. Lincoln Avenue, Urbana, IL 61802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8343-794X

Funding

NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Illinois, between 1990 and 2017, tick-borne diseases in humans increased 10-fold, yet we have insufficient information on when and where people are exposed to vector ticks (Ixodida: Ixodidae). The aims of our research were to compare contributions of passive and active tick collection methods in determining establishment of ticks of public health concern and obtain information on tick distributions within Illinois. We used three surveillance strategies within the Illinois Tick Inventory Collaboration Network to gather information about the ticks of public health concern: 1) passive collection (voluntary submission by the public); 2) systematic collection (biweekly active surveillance); and 3) special collections (active collections in locations of special interest). Of collected adult and nymphal ticks, 436 were from passive collections, 142 from systematic collections, and 1,270 from special collections. Tick species distribution status changed in 36 counties. Our data provide noteworthy updates to distribution maps for use by public health agencies to develop prevention and control strategies. Additionally, the program built a network of collaborations and partnerships to support future tick surveillance efforts within Illinois and highlighted how the combination of the three surveillance strategies can be used to determine geographic spread of ticks, pinpoint locations in need of more surveillance, and help with long-term efforts that support phenology studies.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringIxodidaeAnimalsArachnid VectorsIllinoisPublic HealthTick-Borne DiseasesTick InfestationsdistributionestablishmentIllinoissurveillancetick

Identifiers

PMID33855433
PMCPMC8285025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.