Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33855265›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2021

Characteristics and Outcomes of ERCP at a Canadian Tertiary Centre: Initial Results from a Prospective High-Fidelity Biliary Endoscopy Registry.

Nauzer Forbes, Hannah F Koury, Sydney Bass, Martin Cole, Rachid Mohamed, Christian Turbide, Emmanuel Gonzalez-Moreno, Ahmed Kayal, Millie Chau, B Cord Lethebe and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) Position Statement on the Use of Hyoscine-Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nauzer ForbesDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Hannah F KouryCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sydney BassDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Martin ColeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Rachid MohamedDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Christian TurbideDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Emmanuel Gonzalez-MorenoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Ahmed KayalDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3070-6624
Millie ChauDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
B Cord LethebeCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Robert J HilsdenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Steven J HeitmanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an essential procedure in the management of pancreatic and biliary disease. While its role is firmly established, further well-designed prospective ERCP research is required, as a large portion of previous work has employed retrospective or administrative methodologies, both prone to potential biases. The aim of the Calgary Registry for Advanced and Therapeutic Endoscopy (CReATE) is to be a high-fidelity prospective multicentre registry.

methodsThe study population consisted of consecutive adult ERCP patients from September 2018 to September 2019. Informed consent was acquired for each patient. All relevant preprocedural, procedural, peri-procedural and postprocedural data were captured in real time by a full-time third-party research assistant directly observing procedures. Outcomes were ascertained by comprehensive medical record review and patient phone interview 30 days after the index procedure.

resultsFive endoscopists performed 895 ERCP procedures, 90.1% of which were deemed successful. Suspected choledocholithiasis was the most common indication for ERCP, followed by suspected or confirmed stricture(s), at 61.0% and 29.5%, respectively. 61.0% of procedures were performed on ERCP-naive patients. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred following 4.9% of procedures, with clinically significant bleeding or perforation occurring following 1.8% and 0.1% of procedures, respectively. DISCUSSION: Through 12 months, CReATE captured 895 procedures prospectively, with each entry containing over 300 data fields. Active expansion to additional tertiary centres is underway, and this will enhance the existing data pool. CReATE has the potential to improve multiple facets of ERCP, including training, optimal procedural techniques, mitigation of adverse events and personalized patient care.

Indexed as

EndoscopyERCPHealth servicesRegistries

Identifiers

PMID33855265
PMCPMC8023809
OpenAlexW3006734580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.