Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33855251›Full record

ArticlePediatric quality & safety

Vaccinating in the Emergency Department, a Model to Overcome Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy.

Shannon H Baumer-Mouradian, Ashley Servi, Abigail Kleinschmidt, Mark Nimmer, Kimberly Lazarevic, Thomas Hanson, Jena Jastrow, Brian Jaworski, Matthew Kopetsky, Amy L Drendel

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vaccine Preventable Diseases in the Emergency Department.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shannon H Baumer-MouradianDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Ashley ServiChildren's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Abigail KleinschmidtChildren's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Mark NimmerDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Kimberly LazarevicChildren's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Thomas HansonChildren's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Jena JastrowChildren's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Brian JaworskiChildren's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Matthew KopetskyDepartment of Business Intelligence and Data Warehousing, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Amy L DrendelDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVaccine hesitancy and delays in vaccine administration time have limited the success of prior influenza vaccination initiatives in the pediatric emergency department (ED). In 2018-2019, season 1, this ED implemented mandatory vaccine screening and offered the vaccine to all eligible patients; however, only 9% of the eligible population received the vaccine. In 2019-2020, season 2, the team sought to improve influenza vaccination rates from 9% to 15% and administer over 2,000 vaccines to eligible ED patients.

methodsKey drivers included: identifying vaccine hesitancy, providing counseling, reducing administration delays, and developing reminders for vaccine administration. We tested interventions using plan-do-study-act cycles. We included discharged ED patients, age 6 months-18 years old, emergency severity index score 2-5, and no prior vaccine this season. Process measures included percent of patients screened, eligible, accepting the vaccine, and leaving before vaccination. Outcome measures were the percent of eligible patients vaccinated and the total number of vaccines administered. Vaccination time was the balancing measure.

resultsWe included 57,804 children in this study. Comparing season 1 to 2, screening rates (84%) and eligibility rates (58%) were similar. Vaccine acceptance rates improved from 13% to 22%, the proportion of patients leaving before vaccination decreased from 32% to 17%, and vaccination rates improved from 9% to 20%. Total vaccines administered increased from 1,309 to 3,180, and vaccination time was 5 minutes faster in season 2.

conclusionsThis ED influenza vaccination process provides a model to overcome vaccine hesitancy and can be adapted and replicated for any vaccine-preventable illness.

Identifiers

PMID33855251
PMCPMC8032353
OpenAlexW3156730162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.