ArticleJPRAS open2021
Multiscale sterilizable 3D printed auricular templates to guide cartilaginous framework sizing and sculpture during autologous microtia reconstruction.
Article in JPRAS open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The cutting edge of customized surgery: 3D-printed models for patient-specific interventions in otology and auricular management-a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Personalized 3D-printed retainers as a novel approach to maintain the auricular morphology after corrective surgery for cryptotia: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The utilization of three-dimensional imaging and three-dimensional-printed model in autologous microtia reconstruction.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Cost-effective 3D scanning and printing technologies for outer ear reconstruction: current status.Head & face medicine · 2023Review
- An ear-shaped film with a "leg".Translational pediatrics · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the Usability of a Low-Cost 3D Printer in a Tissue Engineering Approach for External Ear Reconstruction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microtia reconstruction using autologous costal cartilage can be one of the most challenging tasks in reconstructive surgery. An intraoperative guide using 2-dimentional drawing of the contralateral ear on an x-ray film remains the current standard of care. In this paper, we present the use of computer-aided design and desktop 3D printing to fabricate low cost, sterilizable auricular carving templates to serve as a peri-operative reference for microtia reconstruction. The design was made as a single component which incorporated the usual anatomic reference points of the ear based on Nagata technique as a Stereo-lithography file format (. STL) for 3D printing. The templates were created in sizes ranging from 55 mm to 70 mm with a 2 mm increment with an average production cost of 0.26 US dollars per material per template and about 4.5 US dollars for the whole set. Individual templates were then 3D-printed using a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU 95A) semiflexible filament on a desktop fused deposition modeling, Ultimaker 2 + 3D printer. The produced template tolerated the sterilization process with no structural changes as compared to its pre-sterilization condition. In conclusion, we present cost-effective, sterilizable, multiscale auricular templates to guide the pre- and intra-operative carving of the cartilaginous framework during microtia reconstruction with more accuracy in a time efficient manner, thereby overcoming the drawbacks of using the traditional x-ray film. The templates are readily accessible and sharable for free through open-source software and can be directly 3D-printed using an affordable desktop 3D printer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.